Liquid Biopsy Based Bladder Cancer Diagnostic by Machine Learning

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The timely diagnostics of bladder cancer is still a challenge in clinical settings. The reliability of conventional testing methods does not reach desirable accuracy and sensitivity, and it has an invasive nature. The present study examines the application of machine learning to improve bladder cancer diagnostics by integrating miRNA expression levels, demographic routine laboratory test results, and clinical data. We proposed that merging these datasets would enhance diagnostic accuracy. <b>Methods</b>: This study combined molecular biology methods for liquid biopsy, routine clinical data, and application of machine learning approach for the acquired data analysis. We evaluated urinary exosome miRNA expression data in combination with patient test results, as well as clinical and demographic data using three machine learning models: Random Forest, SVM, and XGBoost classifiers. <b>Results</b>: Based solely on miRNA data, the SVM model achieved an ROC curve area of 0.75. Patient analysis' clinical and demographic data obtained ROC curve area of 0.80. Combining both data types enhanced performance, resulting in an F1 score of 0.79 and an ROC of 0.85. The feature importance analysis identified key predictors, including erythrocytes in urine, age, and several miRNAs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings indicate the potential of a multi-modal approach to improve the accuracy of bladder cancer diagnosis in a non-invasive manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040492
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liquid Biopsy Based Bladder Cancer Diagnostic by Machine Learning

Egils Vjaters, Edvīns Miklaševičs, Zanda Daneberga, S. Silina et al.
4 citations
Diagnostics
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
8.03
article

Liquid Biopsy Based Bladder Cancer Diagnostic by Machine Learning

Egils Vjaters, Edvīns Miklaševičs, Zanda Daneberga, S. Silina, Miki Nakazawa, V. Lietuvietis, E. Bitina-Barlote, J. Plonis, Jānis Gardovskis, Dmitrijs Bļizņuks, Mihails Šatcs
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The timely diagnostics of bladder cancer is still a challenge in clinical settings. The reliability of conventional testing methods does not reach desirable accuracy and sensitivity, and it has an invasive nature. The present study examines the application of machine learning to improve bladder cancer diagnostics by integrating miRNA expression levels, demographic routine laboratory test results, and clinical data. We proposed that merging these datasets would enhance diagnostic accuracy. <b>Methods</b>: This study combined molecular biology methods for liquid biopsy, routine clinical data, and application of machine learning approach for the acquired data analysis. We evaluated urinary exosome miRNA expression data in combination with patient test results, as well as clinical and demographic data using three machine learning models: Random Forest, SVM, and XGBoost classifiers. <b>Results</b>: Based solely on miRNA data, the SVM model achieved an ROC curve area of 0.75. Patient analysis' clinical and demographic data obtained ROC curve area of 0.80. Combining both data types enhanced performance, resulting in an F1 score of 0.79 and an ROC of 0.85. The feature importance analysis identified key predictors, including erythrocytes in urine, age, and several miRNAs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings indicate the potential of a multi-modal approach to improve the accuracy of bladder cancer diagnosis in a non-invasive manner.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(4)
Riga Technical University (LV), Riga East University Hospital (LV), Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
8.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.