A Conversation Analysis of Speech Interruptions in the TV Job-seeking Program Shark Tank: Season 12

Television job-seeking programs like “Shark Tank” blend entertainment with real-world application, providing a rich context for analyzing conversational dynamics. This study aimed to explore the types and functions of speech interruptions within “Shark Tank: Season 12” through a conversation analysis framework. By examining 20 episodes, the research identified key interruption functions such as floor-taking, agreement, assistance, tangentialization, clarification, and disagreement. The findings revealed that interruptions are strategically employed to assert dominance, build rapport, provide guidance, shift focus, clarify information, and express dissent. These findings contribute to the understanding of how language is used to navigate high-stakes interactions in televised job-seeking contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Lasalliana Journal of Education and Humanities
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55902/jkew3987
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conversation Analysis of Speech Interruptions in the TV Job-seeking Program Shark Tank: Season 12

Hao Yongbing
Academia Lasalliana Journal of Education and Humanities
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

A Conversation Analysis of Speech Interruptions in the TV Job-seeking Program Shark Tank: Season 12

Hao Yongbing
article en

Abstract

Television job-seeking programs like “Shark Tank” blend entertainment with real-world application, providing a rich context for analyzing conversational dynamics. This study aimed to explore the types and functions of speech interruptions within “Shark Tank: Season 12” through a conversation analysis framework. By examining 20 episodes, the research identified key interruption functions such as floor-taking, agreement, assistance, tangentialization, clarification, and disagreement. The findings revealed that interruptions are strategically employed to assert dominance, build rapport, provide guidance, shift focus, clarify information, and express dissent. These findings contribute to the understanding of how language is used to navigate high-stakes interactions in televised job-seeking contexts.

Academia Lasalliana Journal of Education and HumanitiesVol. 6(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.