A study of ‘shenme'-type rhetorical questions from an interactional perspective

This paper, based on an interactive perspective, examines ‘shenme'-type rhetorical questions in the TV series I Love My Family from three aspects: lexical and syntactic features, prosodic features, and physical activity cues. These questions often include negative lexical items and appear in response positions, although the presence of negativity is not a strict criterion but serves as an auxiliary feature. Prosodically, ‘shenme’ exhibits shorter duration, faster speech rate, and is usually unstressed, with a preference for falling intonation despite variation in sentence-final patterns. Additionally, physical cues such as gaze shifts and head lifts are occasionally observed but are inconsistent, serving as secondary interpretative aids. These findings highlight the interplay between prosody and physical cues in interpreting the rhetorical function of ‘shenme’-type questions, offering insights into their unique role in conversational dynamics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2024.12.111.513
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study of ‘shenme'-type rhetorical questions from an interactional perspective

Woo‐Cheol Lee, Dexiao Zhou
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

A study of ‘shenme'-type rhetorical questions from an interactional perspective

Woo‐Cheol Lee, Dexiao Zhou
article en

Abstract

This paper, based on an interactive perspective, examines ‘shenme'-type rhetorical questions in the TV series I Love My Family from three aspects: lexical and syntactic features, prosodic features, and physical activity cues. These questions often include negative lexical items and appear in response positions, although the presence of negativity is not a strict criterion but serves as an auxiliary feature. Prosodically, ‘shenme’ exhibits shorter duration, faster speech rate, and is usually unstressed, with a preference for falling intonation despite variation in sentence-final patterns. Additionally, physical cues such as gaze shifts and head lifts are occasionally observed but are inconsistent, serving as secondary interpretative aids. These findings highlight the interplay between prosody and physical cues in interpreting the rhetorical function of ‘shenme’-type questions, offering insights into their unique role in conversational dynamics.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 111
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.