Errors in signalling nouns in opinion writing by EFL Chinese and Korean learners

Research on error analysis has taken a holistic approach to gain general insights into how L2 learners make errors when using various linguistic items. However, the present study attempts to fine-tune the analysis of signalling noun errors. Using Korean and Chinese learners’ opinion writing samples drawn from the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE), the study analyzes signalling noun errors in terms of quantities and qualities. The findings revealed that despite a higher amount of signalling nouns produced by the Chinese group, the Korean group made significantly more signalling noun errors, most of which consisted of determiner colligation errors. It also showed that their developmental processes at the intermediate levels varied despite their overall decreased errors in the final stage in both groups. This study has implications for teaching signalling nouns for lexical coherence in academic writing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2024.12.111.141
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Errors in signalling nouns in opinion writing by EFL Chinese and Korean learners

Hyojung Lee
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Errors in signalling nouns in opinion writing by EFL Chinese and Korean learners

Hyojung Lee
article en

Abstract

Research on error analysis has taken a holistic approach to gain general insights into how L2 learners make errors when using various linguistic items. However, the present study attempts to fine-tune the analysis of signalling noun errors. Using Korean and Chinese learners’ opinion writing samples drawn from the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE), the study analyzes signalling noun errors in terms of quantities and qualities. The findings revealed that despite a higher amount of signalling nouns produced by the Chinese group, the Korean group made significantly more signalling noun errors, most of which consisted of determiner colligation errors. It also showed that their developmental processes at the intermediate levels varied despite their overall decreased errors in the final stage in both groups. This study has implications for teaching signalling nouns for lexical coherence in academic writing.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 111
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Errors in signalling nouns in opinion writing by EFL Chinese and Korean learners — Hyojung Lee · The Journal of Linguistics Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS