A comparative analysis of POSITIVE IS FRONT and NEGATIVE IS BACK metaphors in Korean Sign Language with Korean and English

This paper examines how Korean Sign Language (KSL) employs space and movement to express metaphors. By analyzing metaphors such as POSITIVE IS FRONT and NEGATIVE IS BACK in both Korean and English, the study identifies a shared feature: horizontal metaphors are prevalent across spoken and sign languages. However, while spoken languages express these metaphors through lexical words within sentences, KSL integrates them into the sublexical elements of individual signs, such as location and movement. These components undergo iconic and metaphorical mapping, reflecting KSL’s ability to embed metaphor at the lexical level. Drawing on Taub’s (2001) concept of double mapping, this paper demonstrates how KSL’s visual-spatial modality allows signers to process metaphors more explicitly and dynamically, offering new insights into the conceptualization of abstract ideas across both sign and spoken languages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2024.12.111.47
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of POSITIVE IS FRONT and NEGATIVE IS BACK metaphors in Korean Sign Language with Korean and English

Youngju Choi, Michelle Jeong
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

A comparative analysis of POSITIVE IS FRONT and NEGATIVE IS BACK metaphors in Korean Sign Language with Korean and English

Youngju Choi, Michelle Jeong
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how Korean Sign Language (KSL) employs space and movement to express metaphors. By analyzing metaphors such as POSITIVE IS FRONT and NEGATIVE IS BACK in both Korean and English, the study identifies a shared feature: horizontal metaphors are prevalent across spoken and sign languages. However, while spoken languages express these metaphors through lexical words within sentences, KSL integrates them into the sublexical elements of individual signs, such as location and movement. These components undergo iconic and metaphorical mapping, reflecting KSL’s ability to embed metaphor at the lexical level. Drawing on Taub’s (2001) concept of double mapping, this paper demonstrates how KSL’s visual-spatial modality allows signers to process metaphors more explicitly and dynamically, offering new insights into the conceptualization of abstract ideas across both sign and spoken languages.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 111
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.