An eye-movement study of EFL learners’ English dative sentence processing by proficiency levels

The current study aims to investigate how EFL learners read English dative alternation structures differently based on their proficiency levels. Eye-movement data on the areas of NP1 (subject), verb, NP2, and NP3 in sentences was analyzed, under fixation counts, regression fixation, and reading time data (first-pass, second-pass, and total reading time). The results showed EFL learners undergo more cognitive efforts in processing for DO than for PD. The NP2 area plays a critical role in dative structure sentence processing. Regarding the proficiency levels, the lower proficient group showed more salient differences between the processing for DO and PD. This study showed a contrast pattern in first-pass reading time from the higher proficiency group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2024.12.111.163
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An eye-movement study of EFL learners’ English dative sentence processing by proficiency levels

Sungmook Choi, Boon-Joo Park
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

An eye-movement study of EFL learners’ English dative sentence processing by proficiency levels

Sungmook Choi, Boon-Joo Park
article en

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate how EFL learners read English dative alternation structures differently based on their proficiency levels. Eye-movement data on the areas of NP1 (subject), verb, NP2, and NP3 in sentences was analyzed, under fixation counts, regression fixation, and reading time data (first-pass, second-pass, and total reading time). The results showed EFL learners undergo more cognitive efforts in processing for DO than for PD. The NP2 area plays a critical role in dative structure sentence processing. Regarding the proficiency levels, the lower proficient group showed more salient differences between the processing for DO and PD. This study showed a contrast pattern in first-pass reading time from the higher proficiency group.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 111
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.