Genomic Assessment of Australian White Sharks ( <i>Carcharodon carcharias</i> ) Challenges Previous Evidence of Population Subdivision

ABSTRACT Aim The white shark ( Carcharodon carcharias ) is one of the world's largest and most recognisable marine predators but has suffered significant declines since the mid‐twentieth century. Conservation efforts remain complicated by persistent knowledge gaps associated with white shark biology and ecology, including the biological connectedness of white shark populations. We re‐assess patterns of population genetic structure in Australian white sharks, where two subpopulations—eastern and southern‐western—are currently recognised based on previous animal tracking and genetic assessments. Methods Population genomic analyses are performed using tissues from ~650 individual white sharks and ~7000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci generated through reduced genome representation sequencing. We test for evidence of genetic structure and relatedness among sharks from eastern and southern Australia and use population genetic simulations to assess the likely strength of inter‐generational migration between regions. Results This study challenges the current paradigm of population structure in Australian white sharks, showing a lack of genetic structure between white sharks from eastern and southern Australia. These findings are further supported by population genetic simulations and kinship analyses indicating high levels of intergenerational migration and relatedness between regions. Consistent with recent reports from eastern Australia, we also detected high levels of relatedness among juvenile and subadult white sharks and estimated the overall effective population size ( Ne ) of Australian white sharks to be less than 500 individuals. Furthermore, we provide evidence of a potential reduction in Ne over the last two generations. Main Conclusions Overall, these findings highlight the need to consider this revised estimate of genetic structure when discussing the management and conservation of the species. Our results also raise concerns for the conservation of Australian white sharks highlighting risks of potential inbreeding, and reductions in population fitness and resilience. We discuss the need for further research and the importance of ongoing population monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity and Distributions
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13946
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic Assessment of Australian White Sharks ( Carcharodon carcharias ) Challenges Previous Evidence of Population Subdivision

Dean C. Blower, Andrew Raymond Weeks, Craig D. H. Sherman, Owen J. Holland et al.
6 citations
Diversity and Distributions
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
11.57
article

Genomic Assessment of Australian White Sharks ( Carcharodon carcharias ) Challenges Previous Evidence of Population Subdivision

Dean C. Blower, Andrew Raymond Weeks, Craig D. H. Sherman, Owen J. Holland, Madeline Toomey, Paul A. Butcher, Adam D. Miller, Charlie P.M. Huveneers, Zach S. R. Clark, Jessica J. Fish
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim The white shark ( Carcharodon carcharias ) is one of the world's largest and most recognisable marine predators but has suffered significant declines since the mid‐twentieth century. Conservation efforts remain complicated by persistent knowledge gaps associated with white shark biology and ecology, including the biological connectedness of white shark populations. We re‐assess patterns of population genetic structure in Australian white sharks, where two subpopulations—eastern and southern‐western—are currently recognised based on previous animal tracking and genetic assessments. Methods Population genomic analyses are performed using tissues from ~650 individual white sharks and ~7000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci generated through reduced genome representation sequencing. We test for evidence of genetic structure and relatedness among sharks from eastern and southern Australia and use population genetic simulations to assess the likely strength of inter‐generational migration between regions. Results This study challenges the current paradigm of population structure in Australian white sharks, showing a lack of genetic structure between white sharks from eastern and southern Australia. These findings are further supported by population genetic simulations and kinship analyses indicating high levels of intergenerational migration and relatedness between regions. Consistent with recent reports from eastern Australia, we also detected high levels of relatedness among juvenile and subadult white sharks and estimated the overall effective population size ( Ne ) of Australian white sharks to be less than 500 individuals. Furthermore, we provide evidence of a potential reduction in Ne over the last two generations. Main Conclusions Overall, these findings highlight the need to consider this revised estimate of genetic structure when discussing the management and conservation of the species. Our results also raise concerns for the conservation of Australian white sharks highlighting risks of potential inbreeding, and reductions in population fitness and resilience. We discuss the need for further research and the importance of ongoing population monitoring.

Diversity and DistributionsVol. 31(2)
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), Australia Bioinformatics Resource (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Deakin University, Flinders University, Department of Environment and Water, NSW Department of Primary Industries
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
11.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.