A Comparative-Legal Study of the Regulation of Independent Nurses in the USA, Canada, and France

Introduction: The ever-increasing societal needs for quality and efficient healthcare, both nationally and globally, highlight the importance of independent practice nurses. Achieving clarity and legal certainty in their activities is essential for providing effective healthcare. In this regard, a comparative-legal study of the experience of other countries in the normative regulation of independent nursing practices holds significant scientific and practical importance. Aim: The purpose of the current study is to conduct a comparative-legal analysis of the regulatory framework governing independent practice nurses in the USA, Canada, and France. Materials and Methods: A documentary method was applied, involving a comparative-legal analysis of the legislation of the USA, Canada, and France on the researched problem. Results and Discussion: The comparative-legal analysis of the legislation in the USA, Canada, and France regarding the regulatory framework for independent practicing nurses revealed that the establishment of independent nursing practices and their activities is clearly and systematically organized by the legislatures of these countries. Although different methods are employed, a unified approach to addressing the problem emerges. According to the legal definitions analyzed, registered nurses assist individuals, families, groups, and communities in achieving optimal physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual health and well-being. Conclusion: Societies face similar challenges, and while they may employ different means, they often achieve comparable solutions. Foreign legal systems may use different terms, organizational structures, and institutional logic, yet they provide analogous legal frameworks. The applied comparative-legal approach highlights opportunities for regulating or improving the relevant institute within Bulgarian legislation.