Legal and Constitutional Analysis of Federal Court Decision No. 230/Federal/2022: Regarding Marriage to Second Wife in the Province of Kurdistan

The Federal Court of Iraq issued Decision No. 230/Federal/2022, declaring the unconstitutionality of Article 12 of Law No. 15 of 2008, which grants the first wife the right to request a divorce if the husband marries a second wife. This article, enacted in the Kurdistan Region, was deemed to violate Islamic law and Article 2(a) of the 2005 Iraqi Constitution, which prohibits laws conflicting with the principles of Islam. The decision left behind a heated debate in the courts of the region between working with the article that the court cancelled or adhering to the court’s decision as the competent authority to interpret legal texts and resolve controversial issues. This study aims to examine the legal basis supporting the Federal Court’s decision with legal articles in force in the current Iraqi Personal Status Law, highlight the conflicts in the Kurdistan Region’s legal amendments, and address the decision’s strengths and shortcomings. Utilizing an analytical method, the study reviews and interprets relevant legal texts within the context of Iraqi Personal Status Law. the court, regardless of its supervisory authority, in addition to the justifications mentioned for the cancellation of Article 18 in the Kurdistan Region, is not infallible from shortcomings and observations; because it opposed in its decision what some sects have gone to, and deprived the wife of the right to demand separation under the pretext of violating the texts of the constitution and Islamic law. The study proved that the condition is not contrary to Islamic law as decided by the court; because it is a subject of disagreement among scholars, and it is also not considered contrary to the constants of Islamic rulings as stated in the decision of the Federal Court, because there is no jurisprudential consensus on such constants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
As-Siyasi Journal of Constitutional Law
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v4i2.23614
Primary Topic
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal and Constitutional Analysis of Federal Court Decision No. 230/Federal/2022: Regarding Marriage to Second Wife in the Province of Kurdistan

Sadi Hassan Baram
As-Siyasi Journal of Constitutional Law
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
article

Legal and Constitutional Analysis of Federal Court Decision No. 230/Federal/2022: Regarding Marriage to Second Wife in the Province of Kurdistan

Sadi Hassan Baram
article en

Abstract

The Federal Court of Iraq issued Decision No. 230/Federal/2022, declaring the unconstitutionality of Article 12 of Law No. 15 of 2008, which grants the first wife the right to request a divorce if the husband marries a second wife. This article, enacted in the Kurdistan Region, was deemed to violate Islamic law and Article 2(a) of the 2005 Iraqi Constitution, which prohibits laws conflicting with the principles of Islam. The decision left behind a heated debate in the courts of the region between working with the article that the court cancelled or adhering to the court’s decision as the competent authority to interpret legal texts and resolve controversial issues. This study aims to examine the legal basis supporting the Federal Court’s decision with legal articles in force in the current Iraqi Personal Status Law, highlight the conflicts in the Kurdistan Region’s legal amendments, and address the decision’s strengths and shortcomings. Utilizing an analytical method, the study reviews and interprets relevant legal texts within the context of Iraqi Personal Status Law. the court, regardless of its supervisory authority, in addition to the justifications mentioned for the cancellation of Article 18 in the Kurdistan Region, is not infallible from shortcomings and observations; because it opposed in its decision what some sects have gone to, and deprived the wife of the right to demand separation under the pretext of violating the texts of the constitution and Islamic law. The study proved that the condition is not contrary to Islamic law as decided by the court; because it is a subject of disagreement among scholars, and it is also not considered contrary to the constants of Islamic rulings as stated in the decision of the Federal Court, because there is no jurisprudential consensus on such constants.

As-Siyasi Journal of Constitutional LawVol. 4(2)
University of Halabja (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.