Comparison of Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block Plus Genitofemoral Nerve Block in Patients with Chronic Pelvic/Groin Pain: A Retrospective Quasi-experimental Study

Background: Chronic pelvic/groin pain (CP/GP) is a debilitating condition with various treatment options, including nerve blocks. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (II/IH) nerve block and the combination of genitofemoral (GF) and II/IH nerve block in patients with CP/GP. Methods: This retrospective quasi-experimental (longitudinal) study was conducted at Labbafinejad Hospital (Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran) and assessed the medical records of 54 patients with CP/GP. Patients alternately received interventions from an experienced pain specialist. Twenty-six patients received the II/IH plus GFN block, and 28 patients received the II/IH nerve block alone. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores (before and 1, 2, and 3 months after intervention) available in medical records were extracted for all patients. Results: In the first (P=0.019), second (P=0.015), and third month (P=0.021) following the intervention, patients in the G+I group consistently reported significantly lower pain severity compared to patients in the I group. Patients with pain from surgical causes demonstrated significantly better treatment response than those with idiopathic causes in the second (P=0.014, 0.021) and third months (P=0.015, 0.026) post-intervention in the G+I group compared to the I group. Conclusion: Both II/IH nerve block and II/IH nerve block plus GFN block are effective in treating CP/GP. However, patients who received II/IH nerve block plus GFN block demonstrated a better treatment response than those who received II/IH nerve block alone. Additionally, it is worth noting that patients with pain from surgical causes reported lower pain intensity compared to patients with idiopathic causes in both treatment groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulum-i pizishkī-i Kirmān.
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/jkmu.3907
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block Plus Genitofemoral Nerve Block in Patients with Chronic Pelvic/Groin Pain: A Retrospective Quasi-experimental Study

Masoud Hashemi, Mehrdad Taheri, Keivan Bahrami, Payman Dadkhah et al.
Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulum-i pizishkī-i Kirmān.
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block and Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block Plus Genitofemoral Nerve Block in Patients with Chronic Pelvic/Groin Pain: A Retrospective Quasi-experimental Study

Masoud Hashemi, Mehrdad Taheri, Keivan Bahrami, Payman Dadkhah, Sirous Momenzadeh, Jafar Salehi
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic/groin pain (CP/GP) is a debilitating condition with various treatment options, including nerve blocks. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (II/IH) nerve block and the combination of genitofemoral (GF) and II/IH nerve block in patients with CP/GP. Methods: This retrospective quasi-experimental (longitudinal) study was conducted at Labbafinejad Hospital (Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran) and assessed the medical records of 54 patients with CP/GP. Patients alternately received interventions from an experienced pain specialist. Twenty-six patients received the II/IH plus GFN block, and 28 patients received the II/IH nerve block alone. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores (before and 1, 2, and 3 months after intervention) available in medical records were extracted for all patients. Results: In the first (P=0.019), second (P=0.015), and third month (P=0.021) following the intervention, patients in the G+I group consistently reported significantly lower pain severity compared to patients in the I group. Patients with pain from surgical causes demonstrated significantly better treatment response than those with idiopathic causes in the second (P=0.014, 0.021) and third months (P=0.015, 0.026) post-intervention in the G+I group compared to the I group. Conclusion: Both II/IH nerve block and II/IH nerve block plus GFN block are effective in treating CP/GP. However, patients who received II/IH nerve block plus GFN block demonstrated a better treatment response than those who received II/IH nerve block alone. Additionally, it is worth noting that patients with pain from surgical causes reported lower pain intensity compared to patients with idiopathic causes in both treatment groups.

Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulum-i pizishkī-i Kirmān.Vol. 32
Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR), Imam Hossein Hospital (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.