Readability of Patient Education Materials in Plastic Surgery: Assessing 14 Years of Progress

Despite increasing awareness of the need for equitable access to healthcare, PEMs continue to be written at a reading level well above the recommendation. Over the past 14 years, we have seen only modest improvement in readability indices. In addition to advocating for more accessible PEMs, we must gather a deeper understanding of how patients seek information about plastic surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000006541
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Readability of Patient Education Materials in Plastic Surgery: Assessing 14 Years of Progress

Peter J. Wirth, Aleah M. Warden, Steven P. Moura, Pradeep K. Attaluri et al.
5 citations
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
14.08
article

Readability of Patient Education Materials in Plastic Surgery: Assessing 14 Years of Progress

Peter J. Wirth, Aleah M. Warden, Steven P. Moura, Pradeep K. Attaluri, Jeffrey D. Larson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Despite increasing awareness of the need for equitable access to healthcare, PEMs continue to be written at a reading level well above the recommendation. Over the past 14 years, we have seen only modest improvement in readability indices. In addition to advocating for more accessible PEMs, we must gather a deeper understanding of how patients seek information about plastic surgery.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of South Florida (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
14.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.