Biomechanical Analysis of Stress Fields in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Implant-Supported Cantilever Crown

Implant-supported cantilever crowns can serve as a viable alternative in certain clinical scenarios to circumvent additional surgical procedures either prior to or concurrently with implant placement. Despite the favorable clinical results seen with cantilever crowns, concerns have been raised regarding the long-term biomechanical implications and associated technical challenges. Multiple research investigations have demonstrated that implant-supported cantilever crowns have the potential to generate heightened stress concentrations within the underlying alveolar bone. The aim of the study is in the biomechanical analysis of stress fields in atrophic posterior maxilla with implant-supported cantilever crown. Functionally important two molars loss was analyzed to provide the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with types III and IV bone, when implantation is complicated due to insufficient bone height (less than 10 mm), low bone density and rigidity, thin cortical core (thickness less or equal to 0.5 mm). In such challenging conditions, placement of cantilever crowns was proposed as an advanced approach. The recommendations for practitioners were formulated after thorough modeling of bone-implant interface with preliminary evaluation of stress fields in adjacent bone. Two (narrow and wide) implants of two lengths were studied (4.5×5.0 mm, 4.5×8.0 mm, 6.0×5.0 mm, 6.0×8.0 mm) as the supports for two teeth loss restoration. Also, a wide spectrum of human bone elasticity parameters was studied in order to generalize the results of the study to wide range of patients (patient-specific approach). Validation of FEA algorithms was provided to receive necessary accuracy of numerical analysis and support developed clinical recommendations. Based on the conducted research results, we draw the attention of implantologists to the fact that the load-bearing capacity of proposed cantilever crown which are supported by short plateau implants is predetermined by the adjacent bone strains because bone stresses in all studied restorative structures were less than the bone ultimate strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/khpiweek61434.2024.10878084
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Analysis of Stress Fields in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Implant-Supported Cantilever Crown

Igor Linetskiy, Andrii Kondratiev, Oleg Yefremov, Larysa Linetska et al.
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Biomechanical Analysis of Stress Fields in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Implant-Supported Cantilever Crown

Igor Linetskiy, Andrii Kondratiev, Oleg Yefremov, Larysa Linetska, Vladislav Demenko, Andrii Kipenskyi
article en

Abstract

Implant-supported cantilever crowns can serve as a viable alternative in certain clinical scenarios to circumvent additional surgical procedures either prior to or concurrently with implant placement. Despite the favorable clinical results seen with cantilever crowns, concerns have been raised regarding the long-term biomechanical implications and associated technical challenges. Multiple research investigations have demonstrated that implant-supported cantilever crowns have the potential to generate heightened stress concentrations within the underlying alveolar bone. The aim of the study is in the biomechanical analysis of stress fields in atrophic posterior maxilla with implant-supported cantilever crown. Functionally important two molars loss was analyzed to provide the implant placement in atrophic maxilla with types III and IV bone, when implantation is complicated due to insufficient bone height (less than 10 mm), low bone density and rigidity, thin cortical core (thickness less or equal to 0.5 mm). In such challenging conditions, placement of cantilever crowns was proposed as an advanced approach. The recommendations for practitioners were formulated after thorough modeling of bone-implant interface with preliminary evaluation of stress fields in adjacent bone. Two (narrow and wide) implants of two lengths were studied (4.5×5.0 mm, 4.5×8.0 mm, 6.0×5.0 mm, 6.0×8.0 mm) as the supports for two teeth loss restoration. Also, a wide spectrum of human bone elasticity parameters was studied in order to generalize the results of the study to wide range of patients (patient-specific approach). Validation of FEA algorithms was provided to receive necessary accuracy of numerical analysis and support developed clinical recommendations. Based on the conducted research results, we draw the attention of implantologists to the fact that the load-bearing capacity of proposed cantilever crown which are supported by short plateau implants is predetermined by the adjacent bone strains because bone stresses in all studied restorative structures were less than the bone ultimate strength.

National Aerospace University – Kharkiv Aviation Institute (UA), O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv (UA), General University Hospital in Prague (CZ), National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.