Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimisation and Particle Swarm Optimisation on the Travelling Salesman Problem and the 0/1 Knapsack Problem

The paper is a comprehensive comparative analysis of three widely recognised metaheuristic algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), applied to two classic NP-hard optimisation problems - the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the 0/1 Knapsack Problem. Utilising standard benchmark datasets, the study analyses each algorithm's ability to approximate the optimal solutions for both problems. In the case of TSP, ACO demonstrates superior performance by effectively mimicking ant foraging behaviour to navigate complex routes, albeit with a slightly higher time consumption. GA shows moderate effectiveness, balancing resource usage with solution quality, while PSO lacks in performance, particularly challenged by the intricacies of TSP. Conversely, for the 0/1 Knapsack Problem, the performance gap narrows, with ACO still leading in efficiency and accuracy, closely followed by PSO, which shows a significant improvement over its TSP application. GA maintains a consistent performance, proving its robustness in finding near-optimal solutions with reasonable resource utilisation. This research contributes to the field by providing an updated and comprehensive comparison of these algorithms, enhancing the understanding of their strengths, weaknesses, and applicability. The findings highlight the necessity of algorithm selection based on specific problem characteristics and suggest potential areas for future research, including hybrid models and further algorithmic refinements for diverse applications. The study serves as a valuable reference for selecting appropriate optimisation techniques in various practical scenarios, contributing significantly to the optimisation and machine learning fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fmlds63805.2024.00082
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Optimization and Packing Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimisation and Particle Swarm Optimisation on the Travelling Salesman Problem and the 0/1 Knapsack Problem

Farhad Ahamed, Imran Rahman, Luke Mathieson
2 citations
Optimization and Packing Problems
0.70
article

Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimisation and Particle Swarm Optimisation on the Travelling Salesman Problem and the 0/1 Knapsack Problem

Farhad Ahamed, Imran Rahman, Luke Mathieson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The paper is a comprehensive comparative analysis of three widely recognised metaheuristic algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), applied to two classic NP-hard optimisation problems - the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the 0/1 Knapsack Problem. Utilising standard benchmark datasets, the study analyses each algorithm's ability to approximate the optimal solutions for both problems. In the case of TSP, ACO demonstrates superior performance by effectively mimicking ant foraging behaviour to navigate complex routes, albeit with a slightly higher time consumption. GA shows moderate effectiveness, balancing resource usage with solution quality, while PSO lacks in performance, particularly challenged by the intricacies of TSP. Conversely, for the 0/1 Knapsack Problem, the performance gap narrows, with ACO still leading in efficiency and accuracy, closely followed by PSO, which shows a significant improvement over its TSP application. GA maintains a consistent performance, proving its robustness in finding near-optimal solutions with reasonable resource utilisation. This research contributes to the field by providing an updated and comprehensive comparison of these algorithms, enhancing the understanding of their strengths, weaknesses, and applicability. The findings highlight the necessity of algorithm selection based on specific problem characteristics and suggest potential areas for future research, including hybrid models and further algorithmic refinements for diverse applications. The study serves as a valuable reference for selecting appropriate optimisation techniques in various practical scenarios, contributing significantly to the optimisation and machine learning fields.

University of Technology Sydney (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Optimization and Packing Problems
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.