Criteria-based Unsupervised Feature Selection Techniques: A Comparative Study Over Chest CT Scan

Research on classifying chest CT scans as normal or abnormal using machine learning and deep learning has garnered significant attention. To address this, various feature selection (FS) methods are employed to reduce dimensionality and identify key features. This paper evaluates criteria tailored to unsupervised binary datasets, such as feature subsets, redundancy, and diversity, by comparing Mutual Information-Based Methods (MI) with Clustering-Based Feature Selection (Agglomerative Clustering) ones. Additionally, it examines Graph Structure, Spectral Properties, and Quality criteria by comparing Graph-Based Methods with Spectral Feature Selection-be (SPEC). For feature reduction, Agglomerative Clustering may offer a slight advantage due to better handling of diversity and redundancy, though the difference is minimal. If these aspects are crucial, Agglomerative Clustering might be preferred. Conversely, for Graph-Based vs. SPEC, SPEC Method is more suitable for feature reduction due to its coherent feature selection and focus on capturing significant patterns related to medical interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acit62805.2024.10877168
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criteria-based Unsupervised Feature Selection Techniques: A Comparative Study Over Chest CT Scan

MohammadNoor Injadat, Abdallah Moubayed, Ali Elrashidi, Shrouq Al-Daja et al.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Criteria-based Unsupervised Feature Selection Techniques: A Comparative Study Over Chest CT Scan

MohammadNoor Injadat, Abdallah Moubayed, Ali Elrashidi, Shrouq Al-Daja, Ala’ Alyabrodi
article en

Abstract

Research on classifying chest CT scans as normal or abnormal using machine learning and deep learning has garnered significant attention. To address this, various feature selection (FS) methods are employed to reduce dimensionality and identify key features. This paper evaluates criteria tailored to unsupervised binary datasets, such as feature subsets, redundancy, and diversity, by comparing Mutual Information-Based Methods (MI) with Clustering-Based Feature Selection (Agglomerative Clustering) ones. Additionally, it examines Graph Structure, Spectral Properties, and Quality criteria by comparing Graph-Based Methods with Spectral Feature Selection-be (SPEC). For feature reduction, Agglomerative Clustering may offer a slight advantage due to better handling of diversity and redundancy, though the difference is minimal. If these aspects are crucial, Agglomerative Clustering might be preferred. Conversely, for Graph-Based vs. SPEC, SPEC Method is more suitable for feature reduction due to its coherent feature selection and focus on capturing significant patterns related to medical interventions.

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Zarqa University (JO), University of Business and Technology (SA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.