Needs analysis for the major autonomous selection system: Focusing on the perceptions of University A members

Objectives The purpose of this study was to explore practical operation plans for the major autonomous selection system that are suitable for university settings, based on the results of analysis of university members' perceptions and needs regarding the operation of the major autonomous selection system. Methods To achieve the purpose of the study, an online survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire targeting members of University A. The collected data were subjected to ‘Importance-Practice Analysis(IPA)’, ‘Borich needs Analysis’, and ‘The Locus for Focus Model Analysis’, and the results were synthesized to analyze the perception of University A members' major selection system. Results First, in the IPA analysis, 2 items (career course contents that helps career exploration and major decision-making, an administrative management organization) were classified as ‘Concentrate here’ area, with high importance but low performance. The priority order according to Borich's needs includes ‘career course contents’, ‘administrative management organization’, ‘communication support with seniors, juniors, and classmates’. The Locus for Focus model analysis revealed that the HH area consisted of 4 items, including ‘career course contents’, ‘career counseling’, ‘administrative management organization’, ‘communication support with seniors, juniors, and classmates’. Conclusions Based on the results of this study, in order to successfully operate a major autonomous selection system at University A, first, educational content that can foster students' autonomy to explore their own career paths, and second, provide students with opportunities to explore various majors. It is suggested that educational content that covers the basics of majors that can be done, and an administrative support system that can take full charge of managing students who entered the program through the self-selecting major system should be established.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2025.25.3.689
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Needs analysis for the major autonomous selection system: Focusing on the perceptions of University A members

Yoogyung Eom
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Needs analysis for the major autonomous selection system: Focusing on the perceptions of University A members

Yoogyung Eom
article en

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to explore practical operation plans for the major autonomous selection system that are suitable for university settings, based on the results of analysis of university members' perceptions and needs regarding the operation of the major autonomous selection system. Methods To achieve the purpose of the study, an online survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire targeting members of University A. The collected data were subjected to ‘Importance-Practice Analysis(IPA)’, ‘Borich needs Analysis’, and ‘The Locus for Focus Model Analysis’, and the results were synthesized to analyze the perception of University A members' major selection system. Results First, in the IPA analysis, 2 items (career course contents that helps career exploration and major decision-making, an administrative management organization) were classified as ‘Concentrate here’ area, with high importance but low performance. The priority order according to Borich's needs includes ‘career course contents’, ‘administrative management organization’, ‘communication support with seniors, juniors, and classmates’. The Locus for Focus model analysis revealed that the HH area consisted of 4 items, including ‘career course contents’, ‘career counseling’, ‘administrative management organization’, ‘communication support with seniors, juniors, and classmates’. Conclusions Based on the results of this study, in order to successfully operate a major autonomous selection system at University A, first, educational content that can foster students' autonomy to explore their own career paths, and second, provide students with opportunities to explore various majors. It is suggested that educational content that covers the basics of majors that can be done, and an administrative support system that can take full charge of managing students who entered the program through the self-selecting major system should be established.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 25(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Needs analysis for the major autonomous selection system: Focusing on the perceptions of University A members — Yoogyung Eom · Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS