Discordances between molecular profiling and precision oncology drug selection of non-small cell lung cancer in China

Background: Precision oncology drugs are a class of targeted drugs that are most effective in a molecularly defined subset of cancer patients. Pretreatment molecular profiling is integral to optimal patient selection. However, discordances between molecular profiling results and actual drug selection become evident in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the discordances between molecular alterations and actual drug selection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. Methods: This retrospective cohort study consecutively included NSCLC patients from a specialized oncology hospital and a general hospital in Beijing between November 2021 and June 2022. Discordances between molecular profiling results and first-line drug selection consisted of the following four scenarios: (1) not receiving any drugs after molecular profiling; (2) receiving precision oncology drugs before getting molecular profiling results or without molecular profiling results; (3) receiving precision oncology drugs without any targeted gene mutations; (4) not receiving precision oncology drugs with targeted gene mutation. Primary outcome was the proportion of discordances of included NSCLC patients in China. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of four scenarios of discordances. Findings: A total of 707 NSCLC patients were included, of whom 519 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, 172 with squamous cell carcinoma, and 16 with other pathological types. The proportion of molecular profiling in NSCLC patients was 62.4% (441/707), with adenocarcinoma patients accounting for the highest percentage at 83.4% (368/441). The proportion of discordances between molecular profiling results and first-line drug selection was 25.2% (178/707). 17.8% (126/707) patients did not receive any drugs after molecular profiling, 1.7% (12/707) received precision oncology drugs before getting molecular profiling results or without any molecular profiling results, 1.1% (8/707) received precision oncology drugs without any targeted gene mutations, 4.5% (32/707) did not received precision oncology drugs with targeted gene mutation. Interpretation: This study highlighted a quarter of NSCLC patients had the discordances between molecular profiling results and first-line drug selection in China, which may result in a loss of survival benefit to the patient, and a waste of the value of molecular profiling. Future studies need to evaluate and intervene the discordances to optimize the implementation of precision oncology therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101451
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discordances between molecular profiling and precision oncology drug selection of non-small cell lung cancer in China

Xiaowen Hu, Wei Liu, Gengchen Wang, Xindi Liu et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Discordances between molecular profiling and precision oncology drug selection of non-small cell lung cancer in China

Xiaowen Hu, Wei Liu, Gengchen Wang, Xindi Liu, Xiaodong Guan, Jingtao Liu, Shiyu Zhang, Xue Wang, Xu Ma, Xiaoyan Nie, Caiying Wu
article en

Abstract

Background: Precision oncology drugs are a class of targeted drugs that are most effective in a molecularly defined subset of cancer patients. Pretreatment molecular profiling is integral to optimal patient selection. However, discordances between molecular profiling results and actual drug selection become evident in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the discordances between molecular alterations and actual drug selection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. Methods: This retrospective cohort study consecutively included NSCLC patients from a specialized oncology hospital and a general hospital in Beijing between November 2021 and June 2022. Discordances between molecular profiling results and first-line drug selection consisted of the following four scenarios: (1) not receiving any drugs after molecular profiling; (2) receiving precision oncology drugs before getting molecular profiling results or without molecular profiling results; (3) receiving precision oncology drugs without any targeted gene mutations; (4) not receiving precision oncology drugs with targeted gene mutation. Primary outcome was the proportion of discordances of included NSCLC patients in China. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of four scenarios of discordances. Findings: A total of 707 NSCLC patients were included, of whom 519 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, 172 with squamous cell carcinoma, and 16 with other pathological types. The proportion of molecular profiling in NSCLC patients was 62.4% (441/707), with adenocarcinoma patients accounting for the highest percentage at 83.4% (368/441). The proportion of discordances between molecular profiling results and first-line drug selection was 25.2% (178/707). 17.8% (126/707) patients did not receive any drugs after molecular profiling, 1.7% (12/707) received precision oncology drugs before getting molecular profiling results or without any molecular profiling results, 1.1% (8/707) received precision oncology drugs without any targeted gene mutations, 4.5% (32/707) did not received precision oncology drugs with targeted gene mutation. Interpretation: This study highlighted a quarter of NSCLC patients had the discordances between molecular profiling results and first-line drug selection in China, which may result in a loss of survival benefit to the patient, and a waste of the value of molecular profiling. Future studies need to evaluate and intervene the discordances to optimize the implementation of precision oncology therapy.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificVol. 55
Peking University (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.