Revisiting the starting age of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Background: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising in Hong Kong. While the existing CRC screening program has been effective, it does not prioritize the prevention of early-onset cases in individuals under 50. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various starting ages for colorectal cancer screening in an Asian population. Methods: In this simulation study, we analyzed 100,000 individuals in Hong Kong, initiating screening at ages 40, 45, and 50, and continuing until age 75. Two primary screening techniques were employed: colonoscopy and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). The effectiveness of different strategies was assessed based on life-years gained, and cost-effectiveness was measured using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Findings: The ICERs for initiating FIT screening at ages 50, 45, and 40 were USD 53,262, USD 67,892, and USD 86,554, respectively. For colonoscopy, the ICERs were USD 267,669, USD 312,848, and USD 372,090 for the same starting ages. Overall, the FIT strategy proved to be more cost-effective. At compliance rates of 70%, 80%, and 90%, FIT screening at age 45 yielded 2,135, 2,296, and 2,438 life-years gained, respectively, while colonoscopy at age 45 yielded 2,725, 2,798, and 2,855 life-years. With increased compliance, FIT could achieve a similar number of life-years as colonoscopy at a lower cost. Interpretation: In Hong Kong, initiating CRC screening with FIT at age 45 is a cost-effective strategy, offering a balance of cost savings and lives saved compared to screening at age 50. This study supports the feasibility and economic viability of implementing FIT as the primary CRC screening method in Hong Kong. Funding: The study was funded by Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF, Ref. No. 20210711), Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR. This work was delivered as part of the PROSPECT team supported by the Cancer Grand Challenges partnership funded by Cancer Research UK, the National Cancer Institute (OT2CA297680), the Bowelbabe Fund for Cancer Research UK and Institut National Du Cancer. Dr. Chan is an American Cancer Society Research Professor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101455
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the starting age of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Mellissa Withers, Jinqiu Yuan, Victor C. W. Chan, Xianjing Liu et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Revisiting the starting age of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Mellissa Withers, Jinqiu Yuan, Victor C. W. Chan, Xianjing Liu, Martin C. S. Wong, Andrew T. Chan, Junjie Huang, Junjie Hang, Wanghong Xu, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Chaoying Zhong, Jianli Lin
article en

Abstract

Background: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising in Hong Kong. While the existing CRC screening program has been effective, it does not prioritize the prevention of early-onset cases in individuals under 50. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various starting ages for colorectal cancer screening in an Asian population. Methods: In this simulation study, we analyzed 100,000 individuals in Hong Kong, initiating screening at ages 40, 45, and 50, and continuing until age 75. Two primary screening techniques were employed: colonoscopy and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). The effectiveness of different strategies was assessed based on life-years gained, and cost-effectiveness was measured using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Findings: The ICERs for initiating FIT screening at ages 50, 45, and 40 were USD 53,262, USD 67,892, and USD 86,554, respectively. For colonoscopy, the ICERs were USD 267,669, USD 312,848, and USD 372,090 for the same starting ages. Overall, the FIT strategy proved to be more cost-effective. At compliance rates of 70%, 80%, and 90%, FIT screening at age 45 yielded 2,135, 2,296, and 2,438 life-years gained, respectively, while colonoscopy at age 45 yielded 2,725, 2,798, and 2,855 life-years. With increased compliance, FIT could achieve a similar number of life-years as colonoscopy at a lower cost. Interpretation: In Hong Kong, initiating CRC screening with FIT at age 45 is a cost-effective strategy, offering a balance of cost savings and lives saved compared to screening at age 50. This study supports the feasibility and economic viability of implementing FIT as the primary CRC screening method in Hong Kong. Funding: The study was funded by Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF, Ref. No. 20210711), Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR. This work was delivered as part of the PROSPECT team supported by the Cancer Grand Challenges partnership funded by Cancer Research UK, the National Cancer Institute (OT2CA297680), the Bowelbabe Fund for Cancer Research UK and Institut National Du Cancer. Dr. Chan is an American Cancer Society Research Professor.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificVol. 55
University of Southern California (US), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Harvard University Press (US), Erasmus MC (NL), Guangdong Ocean University (CN), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.