Consolidative and salvage thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) continues to have poor outcome despite the survival improvements achieved by chemoimmunotherapy. Controversy exists regarding the survival effectiveness of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT), and the role of salvage thoracic radiotherapy (sTRT) remains unexplored in the immunotherapy era. To address these issues, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate the impacts of cTRT and sTRT in ES-SCLC, and to compare the survival benefits of the two treatment regimes. ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases receiving standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy were included in our study, cohorts were divided by treatment with cTRT, sTRT and no TRT. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were performed for comparison of survival between different groups. Univariable and multivariate analyses were carried out for further estimating the survival effectiveness of TRT. A total of 100 ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases were included in our study, with 24 (24.0%) were allocated to the cTRT group, 18 (18.0%) were allocated to the sTRT group, and 58 (58.0%) to the No TRT group. cTRT dramatically decreased the rate of intrathoracic failure compared to sTRT and No TRT (29.4% vs. 60.0%). Moreover, patients who received cTRT had better overall survival (OS) compared to those who did not receive cTRT (median OS, not reached vs. 14.1 months; HR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.70, P=0.01). However, cTRT did not show significantly superior OS compared to sTRT alone (median OS, not reached vs. 21.0 months; HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.27-1.66, P=0.39). In contrast, patients with only thoracic oligo-progression receiving sTRT (N=13) harbored better OS compared to patients with the same progression pattern in No TRT group (N=20) (median OS, 28.6 vs. 13.8 months; HR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.98, P=0.04). In conclusion, our study demonstrated in the chemoimmunotherapy era that cTRT greatly reduced the rate of initial intrathoracic failure and significantly improved the OS of ES-SCLC. Additionally, sTRT showed similar OS benefits with cTRT, and exhibits better OS compared to No TRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101373
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consolidative and salvage thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center

Zhengfei Zhu, Aihua Lan, Huiling Dong, Xiao Chu et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Lung Cancer Research Studies
article

Consolidative and salvage thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center

Zhengfei Zhu, Aihua Lan, Huiling Dong, Xiao Chu, Zhiqin Zheng
article en

Abstract

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) continues to have poor outcome despite the survival improvements achieved by chemoimmunotherapy. Controversy exists regarding the survival effectiveness of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT), and the role of salvage thoracic radiotherapy (sTRT) remains unexplored in the immunotherapy era. To address these issues, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate the impacts of cTRT and sTRT in ES-SCLC, and to compare the survival benefits of the two treatment regimes. ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases receiving standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy were included in our study, cohorts were divided by treatment with cTRT, sTRT and no TRT. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were performed for comparison of survival between different groups. Univariable and multivariate analyses were carried out for further estimating the survival effectiveness of TRT. A total of 100 ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases were included in our study, with 24 (24.0%) were allocated to the cTRT group, 18 (18.0%) were allocated to the sTRT group, and 58 (58.0%) to the No TRT group. cTRT dramatically decreased the rate of intrathoracic failure compared to sTRT and No TRT (29.4% vs. 60.0%). Moreover, patients who received cTRT had better overall survival (OS) compared to those who did not receive cTRT (median OS, not reached vs. 14.1 months; HR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.70, P=0.01). However, cTRT did not show significantly superior OS compared to sTRT alone (median OS, not reached vs. 21.0 months; HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.27-1.66, P=0.39). In contrast, patients with only thoracic oligo-progression receiving sTRT (N=13) harbored better OS compared to patients with the same progression pattern in No TRT group (N=20) (median OS, 28.6 vs. 13.8 months; HR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.98, P=0.04). In conclusion, our study demonstrated in the chemoimmunotherapy era that cTRT greatly reduced the rate of initial intrathoracic failure and significantly improved the OS of ES-SCLC. Additionally, sTRT showed similar OS benefits with cTRT, and exhibits better OS compared to No TRT.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificVol. 55
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Shanghai Clinical Research Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Lung Cancer Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.