Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer: techniques, learning curve, and preliminary results

Background: Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (RALND) has little application experience. In patients with breast cancer that have positive lymph nodes, we present the initial outcomes of RALND. Methods: We examined the medical records of individuals with breast cancer from a single institution that underwent RALND treatment between March 2024 and August 2024. The clinicopathological characteristics, learning curve, and consequences of RALND were investigated to determine the efficacy and safety of RALND. Findings: A total of 21 patients with RALND were included in the analysis. we reported that the Docking time took 8–10 minutes, and the average operation duration was 56.1 ± 14.6 min. After the accumulation of experience in 6 patients, the time required to complete RALND stabilized at about 60 minutes. The mean blood loss was 4.1 ± 2.1 mL, and the number of lymph nodes was 17.1 ± 5.6, of which 2.2 ± 3.5 were positive. All 21 patients had good shoulder joint movement (DASH score 10.82 ± 2.46), and no wound infection and lymphatic leakage were observed. Interpretation: According to our initial experience, RALND is a safe surgical procedure that can decrease intraoperative bleeding and the effect on upper limb function, lower the incidence of complications, and potentially be an alternative technique for treating patients with positive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101339
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer: techniques, learning curve, and preliminary results

Zuxiao Chen, Q. Hu, Zhuo Wu, Yunxiang Luo et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer: techniques, learning curve, and preliminary results

Zuxiao Chen, Q. Hu, Zhuo Wu, Yunxiang Luo, Zongyan Li, Xiaoyan Fu, Haiyan Li
article en

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted axillary lymph node dissection (RALND) has little application experience. In patients with breast cancer that have positive lymph nodes, we present the initial outcomes of RALND. Methods: We examined the medical records of individuals with breast cancer from a single institution that underwent RALND treatment between March 2024 and August 2024. The clinicopathological characteristics, learning curve, and consequences of RALND were investigated to determine the efficacy and safety of RALND. Findings: A total of 21 patients with RALND were included in the analysis. we reported that the Docking time took 8–10 minutes, and the average operation duration was 56.1 ± 14.6 min. After the accumulation of experience in 6 patients, the time required to complete RALND stabilized at about 60 minutes. The mean blood loss was 4.1 ± 2.1 mL, and the number of lymph nodes was 17.1 ± 5.6, of which 2.2 ± 3.5 were positive. All 21 patients had good shoulder joint movement (DASH score 10.82 ± 2.46), and no wound infection and lymphatic leakage were observed. Interpretation: According to our initial experience, RALND is a safe surgical procedure that can decrease intraoperative bleeding and the effect on upper limb function, lower the incidence of complications, and potentially be an alternative technique for treating patients with positive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificVol. 55
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.