Updated efficacy and safety data from a phase II, single-arm, open-label study of durvalumab plus gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (DurGAP) in resectable biliary tract cancer

Background: Our previous research (2024 ASCO Abstract: e16260) highlighted the efficacy and safety data of DurGAP in resectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aims to provide an updated analysis of the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant DurGAP for resectable BTC in our latest cohort of 30 patients. The current results demonstrate consistent outcomes. Detailed data are presented herein. Methods: Resectable, treatment-naïve BTC pts were enrolled and administered 3 cycles of neoadjuvant durvalumab (1000 mg, iv, d1, q3w) + GAP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2, d1, d8, 21d cycle). Primary endpoints included assessing Adverse Events (AEs), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints comprised R0 resection rate, Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS). Findings: Between Feb, 2023 to Aug, 2024, a total of 30 patients were enrolled, 13 (43.3%) were male, all with ECOG 0 and 24 (80.0%) presenting with N1 status. Median age: 65.3 years. Primary sites: intrahepatic (40.0%), extrahepatic (26.7%), gallbladder (33.3%). Median follow-up: 9.45 months; all pts received ≥2 neoadjuvant cycles. The ORR was 60%, with 18 pts demonstrating partial responses (PR). The DCR was 86.7% with 18 PR and 8 stable disease (SD) responses. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased ALT/AST (26.7%), anemia (23.3%), hypoalbuminemia (16.7%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 2 (6.7%) pts. 16 pts underwent resection, comprising 12 PR, 2 SD, and 2 pts deemed eligible for surgery post-assessment despite a PD response, achieving R0 resection in 15 (93.8%) of cases. 14 pts did not undergo resection, with reasons including patient refusal (4 PR, 1 SD), not meeting resection criteria (2 PD), lost to follow-up (1 PR, 1 SD), and still under active follow-up (1 PR, 4 SD). Interpretation: Neoadjuvant DurGAP demonstrated a consistent and promising ORR and DCR, with a tolerable safety profile, warranting further investigations in a larger cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT05640791. Research Sponsor: None.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101353
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updated efficacy and safety data from a phase II, single-arm, open-label study of durvalumab plus gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (DurGAP) in resectable biliary tract cancer

Yang Liu, Huikai Li, Xihao Zhang
1 links
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Updated efficacy and safety data from a phase II, single-arm, open-label study of durvalumab plus gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (DurGAP) in resectable biliary tract cancer

Yang Liu, Huikai Li, Xihao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background: Our previous research (2024 ASCO Abstract: e16260) highlighted the efficacy and safety data of DurGAP in resectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aims to provide an updated analysis of the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant DurGAP for resectable BTC in our latest cohort of 30 patients. The current results demonstrate consistent outcomes. Detailed data are presented herein. Methods: Resectable, treatment-naïve BTC pts were enrolled and administered 3 cycles of neoadjuvant durvalumab (1000 mg, iv, d1, q3w) + GAP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2, d1, d8, 21d cycle). Primary endpoints included assessing Adverse Events (AEs), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints comprised R0 resection rate, Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS). Findings: Between Feb, 2023 to Aug, 2024, a total of 30 patients were enrolled, 13 (43.3%) were male, all with ECOG 0 and 24 (80.0%) presenting with N1 status. Median age: 65.3 years. Primary sites: intrahepatic (40.0%), extrahepatic (26.7%), gallbladder (33.3%). Median follow-up: 9.45 months; all pts received ≥2 neoadjuvant cycles. The ORR was 60%, with 18 pts demonstrating partial responses (PR). The DCR was 86.7% with 18 PR and 8 stable disease (SD) responses. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased ALT/AST (26.7%), anemia (23.3%), hypoalbuminemia (16.7%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 2 (6.7%) pts. 16 pts underwent resection, comprising 12 PR, 2 SD, and 2 pts deemed eligible for surgery post-assessment despite a PD response, achieving R0 resection in 15 (93.8%) of cases. 14 pts did not undergo resection, with reasons including patient refusal (4 PR, 1 SD), not meeting resection criteria (2 PD), lost to follow-up (1 PR, 1 SD), and still under active follow-up (1 PR, 4 SD). Interpretation: Neoadjuvant DurGAP demonstrated a consistent and promising ORR and DCR, with a tolerable safety profile, warranting further investigations in a larger cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT05640791. Research Sponsor: None.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificVol. 55
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.