Leveraging built marine structures to benefit and minimize impacts on natural habitats

Abstract Many natural marine habitats are decreasing in extent despite global conservation and restoration efforts. In contrast, built marine structures, such as hardened shorelines, offshore energy and aquaculture infrastructure, and artificial reefs, are increasing in extent—and, in some locations, represent over 80% of nearshore, structured habitat. When introduced into the seascape, built marine structures inevitably interact with natural habitats, but these structures are not typically designed to support natural systems. This approach often results in overall harm to natural systems, further impeding marine conservation goals. However, there is growing recognition within the ocean management and engineering community that built marine structures can be strategically designed to minimize their negative impacts and potentially support ecosystems and associated biota. We synthesize the best available science and provide bright spot examples of how leveraging built marine structures to mimic or facilitate natural habitats can help recover biodiversity, augment ecosystem services, and rehabilitate degraded habitats, providing positive outcomes for people and nature in a changing climate. Despite these bright spots, we caution that built structures typically have overall negative environmental consequences for natural habitats and should not be used in lieu of conventional habitat restoration or conservation or to justify the destruction of natural habitats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae135
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging built marine structures to benefit and minimize impacts on natural habitats

Douglas P. Nowacek, Patrick N. Halpin, Siddharth Narayan, D’amy N. Steward et al.
11 citations
BioScience
Coastal and Marine Management
26.64
article

Leveraging built marine structures to benefit and minimize impacts on natural habitats

Douglas P. Nowacek, Patrick N. Halpin, Siddharth Narayan, D’amy N. Steward, Brendan J. Runde, Carter S. Smith, Sarah E. Lester, Maria L. Vozzo, Christine Angelini, Brian R. Silliman, Hayley R. Lemoine, Megan I. Saunders, Jacob E. Allgeier, Rachel K. Gittman, Stephanie R. Valdez, Avery B. Paxton, Rebecca L. Morris, William Seaman
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract Many natural marine habitats are decreasing in extent despite global conservation and restoration efforts. In contrast, built marine structures, such as hardened shorelines, offshore energy and aquaculture infrastructure, and artificial reefs, are increasing in extent—and, in some locations, represent over 80% of nearshore, structured habitat. When introduced into the seascape, built marine structures inevitably interact with natural habitats, but these structures are not typically designed to support natural systems. This approach often results in overall harm to natural systems, further impeding marine conservation goals. However, there is growing recognition within the ocean management and engineering community that built marine structures can be strategically designed to minimize their negative impacts and potentially support ecosystems and associated biota. We synthesize the best available science and provide bright spot examples of how leveraging built marine structures to mimic or facilitate natural habitats can help recover biodiversity, augment ecosystem services, and rehabilitate degraded habitats, providing positive outcomes for people and nature in a changing climate. Despite these bright spots, we caution that built structures typically have overall negative environmental consequences for natural habitats and should not be used in lieu of conventional habitat restoration or conservation or to justify the destruction of natural habitats.

BioScienceVol. 75(2)
Florida State University (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), The Nature Conservancy (US), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), NOAA National Ocean Service (US), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Duke University (US), East Carolina University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Florida (US), Michigan United (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center (US), NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (US), University of Guam (GU), University of South Carolina Beaufort (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Coastal and Marine Management
26.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.