Modeling Propagation Loss at 5.8 GHz: A Comparison of Log-Distance Models and Machine Learning with Empirical Measurements

This study evaluates several propagation loss models by comparing them with empirical data collected from measurement campaigns at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUCRio) at a central frequency of 5.8 GHz. The analysis covers five models: the Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) model, the Log-Distance Path Loss Model (LDPM), the Log-Distance Path Loss Model with Shadowing (LDPM-S) with fixed parameters (n=3, =6), LDPM-S with parameters obtained empirically, and the ADAM algorithm for machine learning. The results demonstrate that the ADAM algorithm achieved significantly higher accuracy than the traditional deterministic models, highlighting its potential to enhance performance in path loss estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lacap63752.2024.10876374
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Propagation Loss at 5.8 GHz: A Comparison of Log-Distance Models and Machine Learning with Empirical Measurements

Leonardo Henrique Gonsioroski, Marcelo Molina Silva, Leoni Marti Miranda Saravia, Alejandro Rommel Miranda Saravia
1 citations
Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
0.21
article

Modeling Propagation Loss at 5.8 GHz: A Comparison of Log-Distance Models and Machine Learning with Empirical Measurements

Leonardo Henrique Gonsioroski, Marcelo Molina Silva, Leoni Marti Miranda Saravia, Alejandro Rommel Miranda Saravia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates several propagation loss models by comparing them with empirical data collected from measurement campaigns at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUCRio) at a central frequency of 5.8 GHz. The analysis covers five models: the Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) model, the Log-Distance Path Loss Model (LDPM), the Log-Distance Path Loss Model with Shadowing (LDPM-S) with fixed parameters (n=3, =6), LDPM-S with parameters obtained empirically, and the ADAM algorithm for machine learning. The results demonstrate that the ADAM algorithm achieved significantly higher accuracy than the traditional deterministic models, highlighting its potential to enhance performance in path loss estimation.

Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.