Polymers as Sensing Layers in MEMS Biosensors for Molecular Diagnosis

Abstract Polymers have been used significantly in MEMS (micro‐electro‐mechanical systems) biosensors as substrates, sensor materials, packaging, surface encapsulation, and transducer elements. The sensing layer is a component that interacts with the target molecule. The choice of material for the sensing layer affects the sensitivity of the sensor. This research explores four commonly used polymers (polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), nylon, poly methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and polyethylene) as a sensor layer for bio‐recognition in MEMS biosensors. The study is simulation‐based. Two models, namely, a simple micro‐cantilever beam and piezoelectric cantilever MEMS, are regarded in the paper. Different properties, such as stress and displacements, are studied, as well as voltage, in the case of the piezoelectric model. The comparative study contributes to understanding how different polymer materials and readout methods impact the choice of material for the sensing layer for MEMS biosensors. Results show that for applications using displacement measurement for further analysis, a simple cantilever is more suitable. The PED model has low displacement sensitivity but is an excellent choice when electric output is required. PDMA shows the best results among the materials used for comparative analysis. The final choice of materials depends on the specific application; PDMA provides flexibility and ease of fabrication, whereas PMMA is more suitable for applications requiring rigidity and chemical resistance. PDMA has 1.63 times more voltage sensitivity than PMMA. Furthermore benefits and challenges of using polymer as a sensing layer are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macromolecular Symposia
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202400113
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polymers as Sensing Layers in MEMS Biosensors for Molecular Diagnosis

I. M. Noor, Pallavi Gupta, Arpana Niranjan, Manisha Rajoria
1 citations
Macromolecular Symposia
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
0.74
article

Polymers as Sensing Layers in MEMS Biosensors for Molecular Diagnosis

I. M. Noor, Pallavi Gupta, Arpana Niranjan, Manisha Rajoria
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Polymers have been used significantly in MEMS (micro‐electro‐mechanical systems) biosensors as substrates, sensor materials, packaging, surface encapsulation, and transducer elements. The sensing layer is a component that interacts with the target molecule. The choice of material for the sensing layer affects the sensitivity of the sensor. This research explores four commonly used polymers (polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), nylon, poly methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and polyethylene) as a sensor layer for bio‐recognition in MEMS biosensors. The study is simulation‐based. Two models, namely, a simple micro‐cantilever beam and piezoelectric cantilever MEMS, are regarded in the paper. Different properties, such as stress and displacements, are studied, as well as voltage, in the case of the piezoelectric model. The comparative study contributes to understanding how different polymer materials and readout methods impact the choice of material for the sensing layer for MEMS biosensors. Results show that for applications using displacement measurement for further analysis, a simple cantilever is more suitable. The PED model has low displacement sensitivity but is an excellent choice when electric output is required. PDMA shows the best results among the materials used for comparative analysis. The final choice of materials depends on the specific application; PDMA provides flexibility and ease of fabrication, whereas PMMA is more suitable for applications requiring rigidity and chemical resistance. PDMA has 1.63 times more voltage sensitivity than PMMA. Furthermore benefits and challenges of using polymer as a sensing layer are also discussed.

Macromolecular SymposiaVol. 414(1)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), Sharda University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.