Deep Learning on Automatic ICD Coding for Clinical Decision Support Systems: Review

The International Code of Disease is a coding method for diagnosing diseases using a clinical text with many benefits, such as insurance claims, medical bills, and hospital finances. However, this coding method is a high-complexity process with a high risk of failure. Recently, researchers have explored the use of Natural Language Processing and various Classification Models to develop Automatic ICD Coding to encounter the manual coding process by assisting doctors and medical staff. This literature review aims to analyze and provide a comprehensive overview of Automatic ICD Coding research. We conducted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram as a guiding principle. We created keywords to search relevant papers between 2021 and 2024 on the SCOPUS database. Our review included 25 relevant papers to be reviewed. This literature review shows that the 10th version of the ICD code is the most popular version, with 14 studies, and the highest number of categories is 17080 categories. Our analysis concluded that MIMIC-III, a publicly available dataset, is the most frequently utilized dataset in this research field. Researchers have used English as a dataset language to develop automatic ICD coding systems. Researcher have conducted their novel classification model to be implemented on Automatic ICD Coding Systems. Future research is able to focus on applying deep learning methods to automatic ICD coding systems using datasets in different languages, ICD versions & categories. Addressing these research gaps is crucial for meeting the evolving needs of clinical and healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ibiomed62485.2024.10875824
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning on Automatic ICD Coding for Clinical Decision Support Systems: Review

Adhistya Erna Permanasari, Indriana Hidayah, Azzamuddien Hanifa
1 citations
AI in cancer detection
0.35
article

Deep Learning on Automatic ICD Coding for Clinical Decision Support Systems: Review

Adhistya Erna Permanasari, Indriana Hidayah, Azzamuddien Hanifa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The International Code of Disease is a coding method for diagnosing diseases using a clinical text with many benefits, such as insurance claims, medical bills, and hospital finances. However, this coding method is a high-complexity process with a high risk of failure. Recently, researchers have explored the use of Natural Language Processing and various Classification Models to develop Automatic ICD Coding to encounter the manual coding process by assisting doctors and medical staff. This literature review aims to analyze and provide a comprehensive overview of Automatic ICD Coding research. We conducted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram as a guiding principle. We created keywords to search relevant papers between 2021 and 2024 on the SCOPUS database. Our review included 25 relevant papers to be reviewed. This literature review shows that the 10th version of the ICD code is the most popular version, with 14 studies, and the highest number of categories is 17080 categories. Our analysis concluded that MIMIC-III, a publicly available dataset, is the most frequently utilized dataset in this research field. Researchers have used English as a dataset language to develop automatic ICD coding systems. Researcher have conducted their novel classification model to be implemented on Automatic ICD Coding Systems. Future research is able to focus on applying deep learning methods to automatic ICD coding systems using datasets in different languages, ICD versions & categories. Addressing these research gaps is crucial for meeting the evolving needs of clinical and healthcare systems.

Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
AI in cancer detection
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deep Learning on Automatic ICD Coding for Clinical Decision Support Systems: Review — Adhistya Erna Permanasari, Indriana Hidayah, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS