Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Desertification in Central Asia Using Bayesian Networks

Desertification presents major environmental challenges in Central Asia, driven by climatic and anthropogenic factors. The present study quantifies desertification risk through an integrated approach using Bayesian networks and the ESAS model, offering a holistic perspective on desertification dynamics. Four key variables—vegetation cover, precipitation, land-use intensity, and soil quality—were incorporated into a Bayesian model to evaluate their influence on desertification. A probabilistic model was developed to gauge desertification intensity, with simulations conducted at 200 geospatial points. Hazard maps for 2030–2050 were produced under climate scenarios SSP245 and SSP585, incorporating projected land-use changes. All procedures for desertification risk assessment, land-use mapping, and climate downscaling were performed using the Google Earth Engine platform. The findings suggest a 4% increase in desertification risk under SSP245 and an 11% increase under SSP585 by 2050, with the greatest threats observed in western regions such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. Sensitivity analysis indicated that vegetation quality exerts the strongest influence on desertification, reflected by a Vegetation Quality Index (VQI) ranging from 1.582 (low in Turkmenistan) to 1.692 (very low in Kazakhstan). A comparison of the Bayesian and ESAS models revealed robust alignment, evidenced by an R2 value of 0.82, a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76, and an RMSE of 0.18. These results highlight the utility of Bayesian networks as an effective tool for desertification assessment and scenario analysis, underscoring the urgency of targeted land management and proactive climate adaptation. Although reclaimed land presents opportunities for afforestation and sustainable agriculture, carefully considering potential trade-offs with biodiversity and ecosystem services remains essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040665
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Desertification in Central Asia Using Bayesian Networks

Yanqun Ren, Panxing He, Jinping Liu, Jianhua Xiao
4 citations
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
6.87
article

Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Desertification in Central Asia Using Bayesian Networks

Yanqun Ren, Panxing He, Jinping Liu, Jianhua Xiao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Desertification presents major environmental challenges in Central Asia, driven by climatic and anthropogenic factors. The present study quantifies desertification risk through an integrated approach using Bayesian networks and the ESAS model, offering a holistic perspective on desertification dynamics. Four key variables—vegetation cover, precipitation, land-use intensity, and soil quality—were incorporated into a Bayesian model to evaluate their influence on desertification. A probabilistic model was developed to gauge desertification intensity, with simulations conducted at 200 geospatial points. Hazard maps for 2030–2050 were produced under climate scenarios SSP245 and SSP585, incorporating projected land-use changes. All procedures for desertification risk assessment, land-use mapping, and climate downscaling were performed using the Google Earth Engine platform. The findings suggest a 4% increase in desertification risk under SSP245 and an 11% increase under SSP585 by 2050, with the greatest threats observed in western regions such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. Sensitivity analysis indicated that vegetation quality exerts the strongest influence on desertification, reflected by a Vegetation Quality Index (VQI) ranging from 1.582 (low in Turkmenistan) to 1.692 (very low in Kazakhstan). A comparison of the Bayesian and ESAS models revealed robust alignment, evidenced by an R2 value of 0.82, a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76, and an RMSE of 0.18. These results highlight the utility of Bayesian networks as an effective tool for desertification assessment and scenario analysis, underscoring the urgency of targeted land management and proactive climate adaptation. Although reclaimed land presents opportunities for afforestation and sustainable agriculture, carefully considering potential trade-offs with biodiversity and ecosystem services remains essential.

Remote SensingVol. 17(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Fudan University (CN), Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources (CN), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.