The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality

Abstract We conjecture that a greater opportunity for audit partners to share personal industry knowledge with each other within audit offices is associated with higher audit quality. Using Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Form AP data, we analyze each partner’s client portfolio and construct sharing measures. First, we find extant measures of an audit office’s industry market share, industry portfolio share, and industry diversity are quite noisy in inferring our sharing measures. Next, we perform multivariate analyses and find negative associations between the opportunity to share industry knowledge and both restatements and absolute abnormal accruals. Further, we find this association varies cross-sectionally with other important auditor and client characteristics. Taken together, our evidence is consistent with a positive association between the opportunity for partners to share their industry knowledge with each other and audit quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09872-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality

Dan Russomanno, Paul N. Michas, Meiling Zhao
2 citations
Review of Accounting Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
article

The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality

Dan Russomanno, Paul N. Michas, Meiling Zhao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We conjecture that a greater opportunity for audit partners to share personal industry knowledge with each other within audit offices is associated with higher audit quality. Using Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Form AP data, we analyze each partner’s client portfolio and construct sharing measures. First, we find extant measures of an audit office’s industry market share, industry portfolio share, and industry diversity are quite noisy in inferring our sharing measures. Next, we perform multivariate analyses and find negative associations between the opportunity to share industry knowledge and both restatements and absolute abnormal accruals. Further, we find this association varies cross-sectionally with other important auditor and client characteristics. Taken together, our evidence is consistent with a positive association between the opportunity for partners to share their industry knowledge with each other and audit quality.

Review of Accounting StudiesVol. 30(3)
University of Arizona (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
University of Arizona, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality — Dan Russomanno, Paul N. Michas, et al. · Review of Accounting Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS