Responden Peserta Didik dan Guru terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis SMA Negeri 3 Pekanbaru

This study aims to analyze teachers' and students' responses to critical thinking skills in biology learning at SMA Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method using observation, interviews, and documentation. The subjects were 11th-grade students and biology teachers. The results indicate that the evaluation process conducted by teachers was inconsistent. Essay-based evaluations were deemed effective in measuring critical thinking skills, although not always based on specific indicators. Most students assessed critical thinking questions as moderately difficult, with their evaluation results categorized as high. However, a gap in students' understanding was identified, requiring further attention. This study recommends the systematic use of critical thinking indicators to better support the development of students' critical thinking skills.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Concept Journal of Social Humanities and Education
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v3i4.1699
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responden Peserta Didik dan Guru terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis SMA Negeri 3 Pekanbaru

Nurkhairo Hidayati, Sepita Ferazona, Fira Herlini
Concept Journal of Social Humanities and Education
Educational Research and Methods
article

Responden Peserta Didik dan Guru terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis SMA Negeri 3 Pekanbaru

Nurkhairo Hidayati, Sepita Ferazona, Fira Herlini
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze teachers' and students' responses to critical thinking skills in biology learning at SMA Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method using observation, interviews, and documentation. The subjects were 11th-grade students and biology teachers. The results indicate that the evaluation process conducted by teachers was inconsistent. Essay-based evaluations were deemed effective in measuring critical thinking skills, although not always based on specific indicators. Most students assessed critical thinking questions as moderately difficult, with their evaluation results categorized as high. However, a gap in students' understanding was identified, requiring further attention. This study recommends the systematic use of critical thinking indicators to better support the development of students' critical thinking skills.

Concept Journal of Social Humanities and EducationVol. 3(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Educational Research and Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.