Pathways for Nucleation and Growth in Confined Spaces and at Interfaces

Mineral crystallization is central to myriad natural processes from the formation of snowflakes to stalagmites, but the molecular-scale mechanisms are often far more complex than models reflect. Feedbacks between the hydro-, bio-, and geo-spheres drive complex crystallization processes that challenge our ability to observe and quantify them, motivating an expansion of crystallization theories. In this article, we discuss how the driving forces and timescales of nucleation are influenced by factors ranging from simple geometric confinement to distinct interfacial solution structures involving solvent organization, electrical double layers, and surface charging effects. Taken together, these ubiquitous natural phenomena can preserve metastable intermediates, drive precipitation of undersaturated phases, and modulate crystallization in time and space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Elements
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.21.1.40
Citations
1
Primary Topic
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways for Nucleation and Growth in Confined Spaces and at Interfaces

Yandi Hu, Ayumi Koishi, Benjamin A. Legg, Michael Whittaker
1 citations
Elements
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
1.30
article

Pathways for Nucleation and Growth in Confined Spaces and at Interfaces

Yandi Hu, Ayumi Koishi, Benjamin A. Legg, Michael Whittaker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mineral crystallization is central to myriad natural processes from the formation of snowflakes to stalagmites, but the molecular-scale mechanisms are often far more complex than models reflect. Feedbacks between the hydro-, bio-, and geo-spheres drive complex crystallization processes that challenge our ability to observe and quantify them, motivating an expansion of crystallization theories. In this article, we discuss how the driving forces and timescales of nucleation are influenced by factors ranging from simple geometric confinement to distinct interfacial solution structures involving solvent organization, electrical double layers, and surface charging effects. Taken together, these ubiquitous natural phenomena can preserve metastable intermediates, drive precipitation of undersaturated phases, and modulate crystallization in time and space.

ElementsVol. 21(1)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Peking University (CN), RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.