Cultural variation in trust and acceptability of artificial intelligence diagnostics for dementia

Digital health innovations hold diagnostic and therapeutic promise but may be subject to biases for underrepresented groups. We explored perceptions of using artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostics for dementia through a focus group as part of the Automated Brain Image Analysis for Timely and Equitable Dementia Diagnosis (ABATED) study. Qualitative feedback from a diverse public engagement group indicated that cultural variations in trust and acceptability of AI diagnostics may be an unrecognised source of real-world inequity. Efforts focused on the adoption of AI diagnostics in memory clinic pathways should aim to recognise and account for this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251319353
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural variation in trust and acceptability of artificial intelligence diagnostics for dementia

Rifah Anjum, S. Hussna Begum, Avinash Chandra, Laura Smith et al.
1 citations
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Cultural variation in trust and acceptability of artificial intelligence diagnostics for dementia

Rifah Anjum, S. Hussna Begum, Avinash Chandra, Laura Smith, Charles R. Marshall, Kaviya Senthilvel, Ijeoma Uchegbu, Helen Beaumont, Reshma Punjabi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital health innovations hold diagnostic and therapeutic promise but may be subject to biases for underrepresented groups. We explored perceptions of using artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostics for dementia through a focus group as part of the Automated Brain Image Analysis for Timely and Equitable Dementia Diagnosis (ABATED) study. Qualitative feedback from a diverse public engagement group indicated that cultural variations in trust and acceptability of AI diagnostics may be an unrecognised source of real-world inequity. Efforts focused on the adoption of AI diagnostics in memory clinic pathways should aim to recognise and account for this issue.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 104(3)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.