Why did the Big Four get so large? Evidence from Australia

Abstract We use a long time-series from Australia to shed light on economic factors that led to audit market concentration and the Big N. We show that increases in the size of a small number of public companies was an important factor that led to large audit firms and market concentration. We also show that emerging Big N firms made sunk cost investments, including in the ability to provide industry expertise and non-audit services, which allowed them to retain clients, differentiate, and grow. These changes occurred around the time the profession lifted restrictions on advertising, which helped facilitate differentiation, and that larger, more complex clients switched to emerging Big N firms while smaller clients switched to non-Big N firms. We do not find that increases in audit market concentration reduced competition; our results instead suggest the audit market became more competitive over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09871-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why did the Big Four get so large? Evidence from Australia

Matt Pinnuck, Douglas J. Skinner, Colin Ferguson
4 citations
Review of Accounting Studies
Corporate Finance and Governance
15.64
article

Why did the Big Four get so large? Evidence from Australia

Matt Pinnuck, Douglas J. Skinner, Colin Ferguson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We use a long time-series from Australia to shed light on economic factors that led to audit market concentration and the Big N. We show that increases in the size of a small number of public companies was an important factor that led to large audit firms and market concentration. We also show that emerging Big N firms made sunk cost investments, including in the ability to provide industry expertise and non-audit services, which allowed them to retain clients, differentiate, and grow. These changes occurred around the time the profession lifted restrictions on advertising, which helped facilitate differentiation, and that larger, more complex clients switched to emerging Big N firms while smaller clients switched to non-Big N firms. We do not find that increases in audit market concentration reduced competition; our results instead suggest the audit market became more competitive over time.

Review of Accounting StudiesVol. 30(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Chicago (US)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Finance and Governance
15.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.