Combining ultrasound gray scale ratio and BI-RADS grading for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

BackgroundThe evaluation of breast mass echo in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) is subjective, whereas ultrasound grayscale ratio (UGSR) provides a quantitative measure of ultrasound echo intensity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the value of UGSR, in conjunction with BI-RADS, for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on ultrasound imaging data from 179 malignant breast mass cases and 219 benign breast mass cases. The masses were categorized according to the BI-RADS grading standard, and the grayscale values of the masses, adjacent fat lobules, and mammary glands were measured using the RADinfo system. The f-UGSR (ratio of ultrasound grayscale of mass to ultrasound grayscale of fat lobule) and g-UGSR (ratio of ultrasound grayscale of mass to ultrasound grayscale of gland) were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, optimal thresholds for f-UGSR and g-UGSR were determined, and the diagnostic efficacy of the combination of f-UGSR, g-UGSR and BI-RADS grading was assessed.ResultsThe f-UGSR for malignant and benign breast masses were 0.57 ± 0.20 and 0.85 ± 0.23, respectively, while the g-UGSR were 0.23 (0.18, 0.30) and 0.38 (0.30, 0.47) respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for f-UGSR and g-UGSR in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were 0.819 and 0.823, respectively, with the optimal thresholds of 0.69 and 0.29, respectively. The AUC for BI-RADS, g-UGSR, and their combination in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were 0.849, 0.823, and 0.821, respectively. Sensitivity rates were approximately 74.30%, 73.74%, and 89.39%, and specificity rates were 95.43%, 77.17%, and 74.89%, respectively.ConclusionUGSR provides an objective and accurate method to evaluate the benign or malignant nature of breast masses. Combining UGSR with BI-RADS enhances sensitivity, reduces the missed diagnosis rate, and improves confidence in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13860291241312430
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining ultrasound gray scale ratio and BI-RADS grading for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

Zhi Huang, Fu-Jian Wang, Pan Wang, Li-hua Xiao
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Combining ultrasound gray scale ratio and BI-RADS grading for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

Zhi Huang, Fu-Jian Wang, Pan Wang, Li-hua Xiao
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe evaluation of breast mass echo in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) is subjective, whereas ultrasound grayscale ratio (UGSR) provides a quantitative measure of ultrasound echo intensity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the value of UGSR, in conjunction with BI-RADS, for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on ultrasound imaging data from 179 malignant breast mass cases and 219 benign breast mass cases. The masses were categorized according to the BI-RADS grading standard, and the grayscale values of the masses, adjacent fat lobules, and mammary glands were measured using the RADinfo system. The f-UGSR (ratio of ultrasound grayscale of mass to ultrasound grayscale of fat lobule) and g-UGSR (ratio of ultrasound grayscale of mass to ultrasound grayscale of gland) were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, optimal thresholds for f-UGSR and g-UGSR were determined, and the diagnostic efficacy of the combination of f-UGSR, g-UGSR and BI-RADS grading was assessed.ResultsThe f-UGSR for malignant and benign breast masses were 0.57 ± 0.20 and 0.85 ± 0.23, respectively, while the g-UGSR were 0.23 (0.18, 0.30) and 0.38 (0.30, 0.47) respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for f-UGSR and g-UGSR in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were 0.819 and 0.823, respectively, with the optimal thresholds of 0.69 and 0.29, respectively. The AUC for BI-RADS, g-UGSR, and their combination in the diagnosis of breast malignant masses were 0.849, 0.823, and 0.821, respectively. Sensitivity rates were approximately 74.30%, 73.74%, and 89.39%, and specificity rates were 95.43%, 77.17%, and 74.89%, respectively.ConclusionUGSR provides an objective and accurate method to evaluate the benign or malignant nature of breast masses. Combining UGSR with BI-RADS enhances sensitivity, reduces the missed diagnosis rate, and improves confidence in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses.

Clinical Hemorheology and MicrocirculationVol. 89(3)
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.