Should Manufacturer Adopt Cross‐Brand Trade‐In Strategy in Cooperation With Recycling Platform?

ABSTRACT This study explores whether manufacturers should independently implement same‐brand trade‐ins or collaborate with recycling platforms for cross‐brand trade‐ins within a concurrent sale and resale framework. In the former strategy, trade‐ins are restricted to manufacturers' branded products, while the latter imposes no such limitations. Our findings reveal that manufacturers prefer cross‐brand trade‐ins due to factors such as reduced market share, high collection costs, or product durability. Interestingly, manufacturers with sufficiently low market share benefit from cross‐brand trade‐ins, irrespective of collection costs. From a market perspective, same‐brand trade‐ins are advantageous when used‐product durability is relatively high; otherwise, cross‐brand trade‐ins are more effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial and Decision Economics
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4514
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should Manufacturer Adopt Cross‐Brand Trade‐In Strategy in Cooperation With Recycling Platform?

Wenli Xiao, Sijie Li, Bin Zheng
1 citations
Managerial and Decision Economics
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
2.23
article

Should Manufacturer Adopt Cross‐Brand Trade‐In Strategy in Cooperation With Recycling Platform?

Wenli Xiao, Sijie Li, Bin Zheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores whether manufacturers should independently implement same‐brand trade‐ins or collaborate with recycling platforms for cross‐brand trade‐ins within a concurrent sale and resale framework. In the former strategy, trade‐ins are restricted to manufacturers' branded products, while the latter imposes no such limitations. Our findings reveal that manufacturers prefer cross‐brand trade‐ins due to factors such as reduced market share, high collection costs, or product durability. Interestingly, manufacturers with sufficiently low market share benefit from cross‐brand trade‐ins, irrespective of collection costs. From a market perspective, same‐brand trade‐ins are advantageous when used‐product durability is relatively high; otherwise, cross‐brand trade‐ins are more effective.

Managerial and Decision EconomicsVol. 46(5)
University of San Diego (US), Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Should Manufacturer Adopt Cross‐Brand Trade‐In Strategy in Cooperation With Recycling Platform? — Wenli Xiao, Sijie Li, et al. · Managerial and Decision Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS