English Clickbait Language Features Which Attract Thai Tertiary EFL Learners

This study explored how likely its Thai participants were to choose to read an article with a clickbait headline, together with how the reasons given for choosing clickbait headlines correspond to the linguistic features found in the headlines. News headlines were presented to 18 participants to rate which news headline they would choose. Then, the rationales behind the selection were elicited using an interview. The results revealed that the majority of the participants preferred non-clickbait headlines because they consider the relevancy of the headlines to themselves as the major factor, followed by the linguistic features of the headline, which marked education as not relevant to choosing to read a news headline. Among the headlines selected, numbers and unanswered questions play a vital role in influencing people to choose non-academic headlines. Numbers make the headline easier to follow and look reliable, while unanswered questions prompt the reader to discover the truth. All in all, clickbait is not as ‘clickbaity’ when personal relevance and preference affect headline selection. Here, personal relevance includes background, interest, and age, whereas personal preference includes entertaining content, use of neutral words, non-question type headlines, and use of formal words used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
rEFLections
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.278870
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

English Clickbait Language Features Which Attract Thai Tertiary EFL Learners

Atipat Boonmoh, Wipatsaya Srimanoi
rEFLections
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

English Clickbait Language Features Which Attract Thai Tertiary EFL Learners

Atipat Boonmoh, Wipatsaya Srimanoi
article en

Abstract

This study explored how likely its Thai participants were to choose to read an article with a clickbait headline, together with how the reasons given for choosing clickbait headlines correspond to the linguistic features found in the headlines. News headlines were presented to 18 participants to rate which news headline they would choose. Then, the rationales behind the selection were elicited using an interview. The results revealed that the majority of the participants preferred non-clickbait headlines because they consider the relevancy of the headlines to themselves as the major factor, followed by the linguistic features of the headline, which marked education as not relevant to choosing to read a news headline. Among the headlines selected, numbers and unanswered questions play a vital role in influencing people to choose non-academic headlines. Numbers make the headline easier to follow and look reliable, while unanswered questions prompt the reader to discover the truth. All in all, clickbait is not as ‘clickbaity’ when personal relevance and preference affect headline selection. Here, personal relevance includes background, interest, and age, whereas personal preference includes entertaining content, use of neutral words, non-question type headlines, and use of formal words used.

rEFLectionsVol. 32(1)
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.