Early Experience of Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Microdiscectomy at a Tertiary Care Centre in Nepal

IntroductionLumbar disc herniation is a leading cause of low back pain and radiculopathy. Open microdiscectomy, though effective, involves muscle dissection and longer recovery. Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy aims to reduce these drawbacks. This study evaluates its early outcomes in Nepal. MethodsOur observational study included patients who underwent MIS tubular lumbar microdiscectomy at our hospital from August 2023 to July 2024. Data on operative duration, blood loss, and return to work time were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed at three months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for spinal and radicular pain. ResultsA total of 22 patients were included. The mean operative duration was 121.5 ± 31.67 minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 60 ± 20.17 mL. The mean return to work time was 1.86 ± 0.2 weeks. At three months, the mean ODI score significantly improved from 54.36 ± 8.8 to 0.91 ± 1.47 (p < 0.001). VAS scores for spinal pain decreased from 3.05 ± 0.84 to 1.5 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001), and radicular pain from 4.91 ± 0.86 to 1.36 ± 0.65 (p < 0.001). No major complications occurred, and 5% of patients had transient paresthesia, which resolved spontaneously. ConclusionMIS tubular lumbar microdiscectomy is an alternative procedure for lumbar disc herniation, offering short-term functional improvement. Long-term comparative studies are needed to assess its durability against open microdiscectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1361
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Experience of Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Microdiscectomy at a Tertiary Care Centre in Nepal

Sandeep Bohara, Gopal Sedain, Amit Pradhanang, Mohan Raj Sharma et al.
2 citations
Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
0.85
article

Early Experience of Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Microdiscectomy at a Tertiary Care Centre in Nepal

Sandeep Bohara, Gopal Sedain, Amit Pradhanang, Mohan Raj Sharma, Prabhat Jha, Anjan Singh Karki, Dipendra Kumar Shrestha, Sushil K Shilpakar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

IntroductionLumbar disc herniation is a leading cause of low back pain and radiculopathy. Open microdiscectomy, though effective, involves muscle dissection and longer recovery. Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy aims to reduce these drawbacks. This study evaluates its early outcomes in Nepal. MethodsOur observational study included patients who underwent MIS tubular lumbar microdiscectomy at our hospital from August 2023 to July 2024. Data on operative duration, blood loss, and return to work time were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed at three months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for spinal and radicular pain. ResultsA total of 22 patients were included. The mean operative duration was 121.5 ± 31.67 minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 60 ± 20.17 mL. The mean return to work time was 1.86 ± 0.2 weeks. At three months, the mean ODI score significantly improved from 54.36 ± 8.8 to 0.91 ± 1.47 (p < 0.001). VAS scores for spinal pain decreased from 3.05 ± 0.84 to 1.5 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001), and radicular pain from 4.91 ± 0.86 to 1.36 ± 0.65 (p < 0.001). No major complications occurred, and 5% of patients had transient paresthesia, which resolved spontaneously. ConclusionMIS tubular lumbar microdiscectomy is an alternative procedure for lumbar disc herniation, offering short-term functional improvement. Long-term comparative studies are needed to assess its durability against open microdiscectomy.

Journal of Institute of Medicine NepalVol. 46(3)
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.