Bureaucratic Reputation Theory: Micro-Level Theoretical Extensions

Abstract Bureaucratic Reputation Theory (BRT) focuses on the role of public agencies’ reputation as an asset in socio-political dynamics. Agencies aim to manage their reputation for different audiences to have higher levels of (publicly legitimized) strategic independence, autonomy, and discretion. Considering that reputations form because of shared reputational beliefs among individuals, we study bureaucratic reputation from a dialogic perspective between agencies and the individual stakeholders in their audiences. First, we make a case that such socio-cognitive elements are relevant for a broad range of public-serving organizations, pinpointing the broader relevance of BRT beyond public agencies. Second, building on interdisciplinary insights on the formation and evolution of individual perceptions, as well as the social network interactions within and between audiences, we derive 10 micro-level theoretical propositions in three related themes: (1) distinct information sources for reputational beliefs, (2) the episodic nature of agency-audience interactions, and (3) the reputation spillovers between structurally related units.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf004
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Corporate Identity and Reputation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bureaucratic Reputation Theory: Micro-Level Theoretical Extensions

Jürgen Willems, Carolin Johanna Waldner, Vera Winter, Flavia Wiedemann
7 citations
Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
Corporate Identity and Reputation
15.58
article

Bureaucratic Reputation Theory: Micro-Level Theoretical Extensions

Jürgen Willems, Carolin Johanna Waldner, Vera Winter, Flavia Wiedemann
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Bureaucratic Reputation Theory (BRT) focuses on the role of public agencies’ reputation as an asset in socio-political dynamics. Agencies aim to manage their reputation for different audiences to have higher levels of (publicly legitimized) strategic independence, autonomy, and discretion. Considering that reputations form because of shared reputational beliefs among individuals, we study bureaucratic reputation from a dialogic perspective between agencies and the individual stakeholders in their audiences. First, we make a case that such socio-cognitive elements are relevant for a broad range of public-serving organizations, pinpointing the broader relevance of BRT beyond public agencies. Second, building on interdisciplinary insights on the formation and evolution of individual perceptions, as well as the social network interactions within and between audiences, we derive 10 micro-level theoretical propositions in three related themes: (1) distinct information sources for reputational beliefs, (2) the episodic nature of agency-audience interactions, and (3) the reputation spillovers between structurally related units.

Perspectives on Public Management and GovernanceVol. 8(2)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), University of Wuppertal (DE), ESCP Business School (DE)
Austrian Science Fund
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corporate Identity and Reputation
15.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.