Михайло Косач як персонаж публіцистики Олени Пчілки (до питання рольових псевдонімів)

The article talks about Olena Pchilka‘s pseudonyms recorded in dictionaries, as well as unidentified as an object for a separate study. The purpose of the article is to outline phenomenology as an object of literary research pseudonyms in Olena Pchilka‘s work in general, in journalism in particular.Achieving this aim requires a combination of methodological approaches: cultural-historical and cultural-sophistic (context of the era, cultural and social mission of the author), psychoanalytical (game in process creativity), metadramatic (“role in role” parameters), linguistic (onomastic aspect of pseudonyms), and structuralist (binary role distribution). Results. In the process of creativity of artists of the 20th century dominate reflectionand conscious playing internal conflicts, and therefore the specificity of the creative process is determined by the game (in the deepest origins, sublimation equals game), and it becomes a special identifier of the author‘s style of dramatization of all genres and types of creative activity. In the article, it is proposed to do this for the first time writer‘s pseudonyms as a separate object of research, with the involvement of a number of modern ones methodologies. It is suggested in the study of writer‘s pseudonyms to turn to acting experience to use pseudonyms and roles. Several theses are offered for expression of thephenomenology of writer‘s pseudonyms. The theses are confirmed by the analysis of two unidentified pseudonyms of Olga Kosach-Dragomanova – Mykhailo Zakhidny and Mykhailo Slobidsky, which appeared in the “Vestniki zemskikh Hadiatsky” in 1917 under her editorship. Conclusions. An important aspect of these two pseudonyms is their clearly emphasized binary (common name, semantically antonymous surnames). This is the embodiment of critical thinking of Olena Pchilka and at the same time of her political foresight. In addition to the main female role, specified in the most known by her pseudonym, Olena Pchilka also created a number of male roles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Волинь філологічна текст і контекст
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29038/2304-9383.2024-38.mok
Primary Topic
Military, Security, and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Михайло Косач як персонаж публіцистики Олени Пчілки (до питання рольових псевдонімів)

Марія Моклиця
Волинь філологічна текст і контекст
Military, Security, and Education Studies
article

Михайло Косач як персонаж публіцистики Олени Пчілки (до питання рольових псевдонімів)

Марія Моклиця
article en

Abstract

The article talks about Olena Pchilka‘s pseudonyms recorded in dictionaries, as well as unidentified as an object for a separate study. The purpose of the article is to outline phenomenology as an object of literary research pseudonyms in Olena Pchilka‘s work in general, in journalism in particular.Achieving this aim requires a combination of methodological approaches: cultural-historical and cultural-sophistic (context of the era, cultural and social mission of the author), psychoanalytical (game in process creativity), metadramatic (“role in role” parameters), linguistic (onomastic aspect of pseudonyms), and structuralist (binary role distribution). Results. In the process of creativity of artists of the 20th century dominate reflectionand conscious playing internal conflicts, and therefore the specificity of the creative process is determined by the game (in the deepest origins, sublimation equals game), and it becomes a special identifier of the author‘s style of dramatization of all genres and types of creative activity. In the article, it is proposed to do this for the first time writer‘s pseudonyms as a separate object of research, with the involvement of a number of modern ones methodologies. It is suggested in the study of writer‘s pseudonyms to turn to acting experience to use pseudonyms and roles. Several theses are offered for expression of thephenomenology of writer‘s pseudonyms. The theses are confirmed by the analysis of two unidentified pseudonyms of Olga Kosach-Dragomanova – Mykhailo Zakhidny and Mykhailo Slobidsky, which appeared in the “Vestniki zemskikh Hadiatsky” in 1917 under her editorship. Conclusions. An important aspect of these two pseudonyms is their clearly emphasized binary (common name, semantically antonymous surnames). This is the embodiment of critical thinking of Olena Pchilka and at the same time of her political foresight. In addition to the main female role, specified in the most known by her pseudonym, Olena Pchilka also created a number of male roles.

Волинь філологічна текст і контекст(38)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Military, Security, and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.