Trading VIX on Volatility Forecasts: Another Volatility Puzzle?

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the economic usefulness of stock market implied volatility forecasts, based on their ability to improve the short‐run trading decision‐making process. The current literature aligns the forecast horizon with the frequency of the trading decision in order to evaluate different forecasting frameworks. By contrast, the premise of our paper is that these should not be necessarily related, but rather the evaluation should be based on the actual needs of the end‐user. Thus, we evaluate whether the multiple days ahead stock market volatility forecasts vis‐à‐vis the 1‐day ahead forecasts can improve the 1‐day ahead trading profits from VIX and the S&P500 futures. Our results suggest that indeed the 1‐day ahead trading profits are significantly improved when the trading decisions are based on longer term volatility forecasts. More specifically, the highest trading gains are obtained when using the 22‐day ahead forecasts. The results hold true for both VIX and S&P500 futures day‐ahead trading. Although there is no theoretical background regarding the fact that forecasting and trading horizons should not be aligned, we strongly motivate this potential issue, both from the statistical and financial points of view.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forecasting
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3257
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trading VIX on Volatility Forecasts: Another Volatility Puzzle?

Stavros Degiannakis, George Filis, Panagiotis Delis, George Giannopoulos
1 citations
Journal of Forecasting
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
article

Trading VIX on Volatility Forecasts: Another Volatility Puzzle?

Stavros Degiannakis, George Filis, Panagiotis Delis, George Giannopoulos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the economic usefulness of stock market implied volatility forecasts, based on their ability to improve the short‐run trading decision‐making process. The current literature aligns the forecast horizon with the frequency of the trading decision in order to evaluate different forecasting frameworks. By contrast, the premise of our paper is that these should not be necessarily related, but rather the evaluation should be based on the actual needs of the end‐user. Thus, we evaluate whether the multiple days ahead stock market volatility forecasts vis‐à‐vis the 1‐day ahead forecasts can improve the 1‐day ahead trading profits from VIX and the S&P500 futures. Our results suggest that indeed the 1‐day ahead trading profits are significantly improved when the trading decisions are based on longer term volatility forecasts. More specifically, the highest trading gains are obtained when using the 22‐day ahead forecasts. The results hold true for both VIX and S&P500 futures day‐ahead trading. Although there is no theoretical background regarding the fact that forecasting and trading horizons should not be aligned, we strongly motivate this potential issue, both from the statistical and financial points of view.

Journal of ForecastingVol. 44(4)
University of Piraeus (GR), University of Patras (GR), Panteion University (GR), Kingston University London (GB), Piraeus Bank (GR), University of West Attica (GR), ATEbank (Greece) (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.