Consciousness and Reality

The paper considers Lenin’s Materialism and Empirio-Criticism as an original work, aimed to interpret dialectics as a theory of knowledge. The paper explores the historical context of the book from a political, scientific, and epistemological point of view, and the different themes underlining the semiotic ideology of Empirio-Criticism. In this view, the criterion of truth which distinguishes dialectic materialism from other middle-class materialist approaches is provided by the transformative power of scientific theories. The dialectic theory of knowledge raises important research questions about the origin of both individual and social consciousness and its relationship with the image of reality. In this light, the book is philosophically still current today: the interpretation of knowledge as a dialectic process can explain the debate between realism and conventionalism in science without falling back on stereotypical metaphysical nor relativist philosophical positions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World marxist review.
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62834/vwsrtc21
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consciousness and Reality

Francesco Galofaro
World marxist review.
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Consciousness and Reality

Francesco Galofaro
article en

Abstract

The paper considers Lenin’s Materialism and Empirio-Criticism as an original work, aimed to interpret dialectics as a theory of knowledge. The paper explores the historical context of the book from a political, scientific, and epistemological point of view, and the different themes underlining the semiotic ideology of Empirio-Criticism. In this view, the criterion of truth which distinguishes dialectic materialism from other middle-class materialist approaches is provided by the transformative power of scientific theories. The dialectic theory of knowledge raises important research questions about the origin of both individual and social consciousness and its relationship with the image of reality. In this light, the book is philosophically still current today: the interpretation of knowledge as a dialectic process can explain the debate between realism and conventionalism in science without falling back on stereotypical metaphysical nor relativist philosophical positions.

World marxist review.Vol. 4(4)
University of Milan (IT), IULM University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consciousness and Reality — Francesco Galofaro · World marxist review. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS