Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Accounting Review
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591
Primary Topic
Accounting Education and Careers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

Di Wang, Christopher S. Chapman
The British Accounting Review
Accounting Education and Careers
article

Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

Di Wang, Christopher S. Chapman
article en

Abstract

Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.

The British Accounting Review
Kyoto University (JP), Lancaster University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Accounting Education and Careers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.