Who is using flexible work arrangements among couples? A longitudinal analysis of the disparities between gender, parenthood, and occupations

The rise of flexible work arrangements (FWAs) holds promise for advancing gender equality by enabling both men and women to better manage work and family. However, this expectation hinges on the actual utilization of FWAs by both genders in response to family needs. Drawing on longitudinal dyadic data from the UK (2010-2022), this study examines the disparities in the use of FWAs among couples by gender, parenthood, and occupation. We find that wives' use of all types of FWAs significantly increases after parenthood, whereas husbands' use remains unchanged. Moreover, mothers' use of FWAs varies by occupation and the type of FWAs. While traditional FWAs (e.g., reduced hours arrangements) are widely used by mothers regardless of their occupations, mothers from professional occupations are more likely to use novel FWAs (e.g., flexible schedule and teleworking arrangements) than those from non-professional occupations. The workplace gender inequalities are thus likely to continue in the FWA era, albeit in more subtle and nuanced forms that vary according to the types of FWAs and occupations involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Research
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103144
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is using flexible work arrangements among couples? A longitudinal analysis of the disparities between gender, parenthood, and occupations

Senhu Wang, Cheng Cheng
5 citations
Social Science Research
Work-Family Balance Challenges
21.01
article

Who is using flexible work arrangements among couples? A longitudinal analysis of the disparities between gender, parenthood, and occupations

Senhu Wang, Cheng Cheng
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The rise of flexible work arrangements (FWAs) holds promise for advancing gender equality by enabling both men and women to better manage work and family. However, this expectation hinges on the actual utilization of FWAs by both genders in response to family needs. Drawing on longitudinal dyadic data from the UK (2010-2022), this study examines the disparities in the use of FWAs among couples by gender, parenthood, and occupation. We find that wives' use of all types of FWAs significantly increases after parenthood, whereas husbands' use remains unchanged. Moreover, mothers' use of FWAs varies by occupation and the type of FWAs. While traditional FWAs (e.g., reduced hours arrangements) are widely used by mothers regardless of their occupations, mothers from professional occupations are more likely to use novel FWAs (e.g., flexible schedule and teleworking arrangements) than those from non-professional occupations. The workplace gender inequalities are thus likely to continue in the FWA era, albeit in more subtle and nuanced forms that vary according to the types of FWAs and occupations involved.

Social Science ResearchVol. 127
National University of Singapore (SG), National University Heart Centre Singapore (SG), Singapore Management University (SG)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who is using flexible work arrangements among couples? A longitudinal analysis of the disparities between gender, parenthood, and occupations — Senhu Wang, Cheng Cheng · Social Science Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS