Optimization of soil hydraulic parameters within a constrained sampling space
• Rosetta 3 reduced the dimensions of soil hydraulic parameter sampling space. • Rosetta 3 reduced uncertainty and provide better estimation in SHP and simulation. • Rosetta 3 led to improvement in algorithm convergence speed and precision. The direct optimization of soil hydraulic parameters (SHP) in unconstrained parameter space introduces significant uncertainties in ecohydrological modeling, particularly when addressing the complex model structure of Richards’ equation combined with Penman-Monteith equation. Pedotransfer functions (e.g., the latest version of Rosetta 3), which have been extensively trained using abundant soil hydraulic data, could potentially provide a physical constraint for sampling SHP. This study integrates optimization algorithms (Particle Swarm Optimization, PSO; Markov Chain Monte Carlo, MCMC; Sequential Monte Carlo, SMC; Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation, GLUE) with two sampling strategies − direct optimization of SHP and indirect optimization of SHP derived from soil particle composition (SPC) using Rosetta 3 − to evaluate their performance in ecohydrological modeling under predefined soil conditions. The results demonstrated that indirect optimization of SHP significantly enhances the accuracy in recovering predefined true parameters and states, and reduces the uncertainty of ecohydrological modeling compared to direct optimization of SHP. Specifically, the mean quartile deviation of biases in soil water content and evaporation were reduced from 0.0347 m 3 /m 3 and 0.0027 m/h to 0.0061 m 3 /m 3 and 0.0010 m/h, respectively. Furthermore, integration of the Rosetta 3 diminished the dimensionality of inverse modeling, thereby significantly enhancing algorithm convergence speed and precision. It is recommended to integrate Rosetta 3 with various optimization algorithms to enhance the accuracy of ecohydrological modeling.
Authors
- Jianzhi Dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-4414)
- Yonggen Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-2558)
- Meijun Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-1004)
- Hongkai Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-8067)
- Qinghai Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-411X)
- Ye Su (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-7528)
- Wenjun Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-5338)
- Wei Shao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1478-5892)
- Yiping Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-1345)
Institutions
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Charles University (CZ)
- Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (CN)
- Qinghai Meteorological Institute (CN)
- Qinghai Meteorological Bureau (CN)
- Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN)
- Bolin Centre for Climate Research (SE)
- East China Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Geoderma
- Published
- 2025-02-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117210
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.95
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China