Accurate detection of local porosity in laser powder bed fusion through deep learning of physics-based in-situ infrared camera signatures

Porosity critically impacts the reliability and performance of metal laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts, affecting properties like fracture toughness and fatigue life. This work proposes a deep learning (DL) framework to predict local porosity in LPBF Inconel 718 parts using in-situ infrared (IR) camera imaging where parts are produced under standard conditions, resulting in 0.03 % overall porosity. The framework achieves over 90 % balanced accuracy for detecting pores above 34 μm at a 360 μm sensor resolution. First, input features include six physics-based IR signatures (cooling rate, heat intensity, interpass temperature, relative melt pool area, spatter generation, and maximum predeposition temperature) and local scan vector length, all linked to porosity generation mechanisms. Second, the framework considers feature interactions across the current pixel and its 26 nearest neighbors. Third, special convolutional filters are developed to filter heat intensity and cooling rate features at edges and stripe boundaries, compensating for limited camera resolution in those regions. Ground truth data on pore size and locations are gathered through serial sectioning and optical microscopy. In unseen parts with varying geometrical features, the framework achieves a true positive rate above 88 % and a false negative rate below 4 % for pores over 34 μm. The proposed DL framework is rigorously compared to traditional machine learning models, demonstrating its superiority in terms of faster training, higher prediction speed, smaller size, and robust performance on unseen test blocks. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanations analysis elucidates pore formation mechanisms, revealing complex feature interactions across different regimes. Results align well with known pore formation mechanisms, indicating that the developed algorithm interprets complex relationships between features and porosity. This work enhances in-situ porosity detection in LPBF and advances the understanding of pore formation mechanisms. • The proposed deep learning framework predicts local porosity in LPBF Inconel 718 parts using physics-based features from in-situ IR imaging. • Tested on unseen blocks, the model achieves over 90 % balanced accuracy in detecting pores larger than 34 µm, despite 0.03 % overall porosity. • SHAP analysis shows the model interprets complex pore formation mechanisms, linking physics-based IR features to porosity formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Additive manufacturing
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2025.104701
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate detection of local porosity in laser powder bed fusion through deep learning of physics-based in-situ infrared camera signatures

Shawn Hinnebusch, Albert C. To, David H. Anderson, Berkay Bostan
9 citations
Additive manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
6.42
article

Accurate detection of local porosity in laser powder bed fusion through deep learning of physics-based in-situ infrared camera signatures

Shawn Hinnebusch, Albert C. To, David H. Anderson, Berkay Bostan
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Porosity critically impacts the reliability and performance of metal laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts, affecting properties like fracture toughness and fatigue life. This work proposes a deep learning (DL) framework to predict local porosity in LPBF Inconel 718 parts using in-situ infrared (IR) camera imaging where parts are produced under standard conditions, resulting in 0.03 % overall porosity. The framework achieves over 90 % balanced accuracy for detecting pores above 34 μm at a 360 μm sensor resolution. First, input features include six physics-based IR signatures (cooling rate, heat intensity, interpass temperature, relative melt pool area, spatter generation, and maximum predeposition temperature) and local scan vector length, all linked to porosity generation mechanisms. Second, the framework considers feature interactions across the current pixel and its 26 nearest neighbors. Third, special convolutional filters are developed to filter heat intensity and cooling rate features at edges and stripe boundaries, compensating for limited camera resolution in those regions. Ground truth data on pore size and locations are gathered through serial sectioning and optical microscopy. In unseen parts with varying geometrical features, the framework achieves a true positive rate above 88 % and a false negative rate below 4 % for pores over 34 μm. The proposed DL framework is rigorously compared to traditional machine learning models, demonstrating its superiority in terms of faster training, higher prediction speed, smaller size, and robust performance on unseen test blocks. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanations analysis elucidates pore formation mechanisms, revealing complex feature interactions across different regimes. Results align well with known pore formation mechanisms, indicating that the developed algorithm interprets complex relationships between features and porosity. This work enhances in-situ porosity detection in LPBF and advances the understanding of pore formation mechanisms. • The proposed deep learning framework predicts local porosity in LPBF Inconel 718 parts using physics-based features from in-situ IR imaging. • Tested on unseen blocks, the model achieves over 90 % balanced accuracy in detecting pores larger than 34 µm, despite 0.03 % overall porosity. • SHAP analysis shows the model interprets complex pore formation mechanisms, linking physics-based IR features to porosity formation.

Additive manufacturingVol. 101
University of Pittsburgh (US)
U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, Office of Naval Research, U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Aviation and Missile Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
6.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.