Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review

The pervasive issue of occupational safety poses a compelling challenge within the global workforce causing a staggering amount of yearly injuries and fatalities worldwide. The relationship between risk perception and behaviors is of particular interest across various fields, but a comprehensive understanding of this association in the occupational sector is lacking. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between risk perception and safety behaviors among front-line workers in high-risk occupations for physical injuries. Using the PRISMA method, 89 peer-reviewed papers from the last two decades were synthesized. The findings revealed a common oversight in recognizing the multidimensional nature of risk perception as only seven out of 89 papers considered both its deliberative (i.e., perceived probability and severity of incurring a hazard’s negative consequences) and affective (i.e., emotional reactions associated with the hazard) dimensions. Despite this, a majority of studies found a significant positive association between risk perception and safety behaviors, although 40% reported mixed or null effects. Individual factors (e.g., attitudes) and organizational factors (e.g., safety climate) were explored as potential mediators with mixed outcomes, while group and leadership factors were largely neglected. This review provides guidelines for more comprehensive future assessments of risk perception in the workplace. Enhancing the understanding of both deliberative and affective dimensions of risk perception is essential for developing effective training programs to improve safety behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106811
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review

Michela Vignoli, Karina Nielsen, Giulia Priolo
14 citations
Safety Science
Occupational Health and Safety Research
21.57
article

Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review

Michela Vignoli, Karina Nielsen, Giulia Priolo
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The pervasive issue of occupational safety poses a compelling challenge within the global workforce causing a staggering amount of yearly injuries and fatalities worldwide. The relationship between risk perception and behaviors is of particular interest across various fields, but a comprehensive understanding of this association in the occupational sector is lacking. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between risk perception and safety behaviors among front-line workers in high-risk occupations for physical injuries. Using the PRISMA method, 89 peer-reviewed papers from the last two decades were synthesized. The findings revealed a common oversight in recognizing the multidimensional nature of risk perception as only seven out of 89 papers considered both its deliberative (i.e., perceived probability and severity of incurring a hazard’s negative consequences) and affective (i.e., emotional reactions associated with the hazard) dimensions. Despite this, a majority of studies found a significant positive association between risk perception and safety behaviors, although 40% reported mixed or null effects. Individual factors (e.g., attitudes) and organizational factors (e.g., safety climate) were explored as potential mediators with mixed outcomes, while group and leadership factors were largely neglected. This review provides guidelines for more comprehensive future assessments of risk perception in the workplace. Enhancing the understanding of both deliberative and affective dimensions of risk perception is essential for developing effective training programs to improve safety behaviors.

Safety ScienceVol. 186
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
21.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.