Projecting the impacts of climate change on soybean production and water requirements using AquaCrop model

Soybean production under rainfed conditions is vulnerable to climate uncertainties, particularly in semi-arid and semi-humid regions. This study assessed the impacts of climate change (SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, SSP5–8.5) on soybean production and water requirements in the near (2041–2060), mid (2061–2080) and far (2081–2100) future. Simulations were conducted in specific locations in Italy (Castelfranco and Cesa) and Slovenia (Ljubljana) under rainfed and irrigated conditions, considering different thresholds of readily available water (RAW) depletion (25–100 %) to start irrigation. The results showed predominantly negative impacts of climate change under rainfed conditions. Under SSP1–2.6 and SSP2–4.5, irrigation mitigated these negative effects, leading to improved soybean performance in Italy in the near and mid future. In contrast, the mitigating potential of irrigation in Ljubljana was reduced, affecting negatively the soybean performance even under irrigated conditions. Nevertheless, the yield potential of Ljubljana remains higher compared to Castelfranco and Cesa. Soybean water productivity (WP ET ) followed similar trend as yield, showing minimal change except under SSP5–8.5 in the mid and far future. Climate change reduced the soybean crop water requirement (CWR) which decreased progressively from SSP1–2.6 to SSP5–8.5 across all time periods. The net irrigation requirement (NIR) was highest under SSP5–8.5, increasing from near to far future but remained stable under SSP1–2.6 and SSP2–4.5. Increasing the RAW depletion threshold for irrigation reduced soybean NIR but significantly decreased yield. Therefore, the results suggest that irrigating soybean at 50 % RAW depletion could be a viable adaptation strategy to climate change, effectively balancing the trade-offs between NIR and yield. • Slovenia achieves better rainfed soybean yield than Italy despite climate change. • Irrigation improves soybean yield more significantly in Italy than Slovenia. • Climate change lowers crop water requirement in both rainfed and irrigated conditions. • Climate change adaptation in soybean cultivation needs frequent, low-volume irrigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127538
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Projecting the impacts of climate change on soybean production and water requirements using AquaCrop model

Wilfredo B. Barrera, Leonardo Verdi, Tjaša Pogačar, Francesco Morbidini et al.
10 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Climate change impacts on agriculture
30.27
article

Projecting the impacts of climate change on soybean production and water requirements using AquaCrop model

Wilfredo B. Barrera, Leonardo Verdi, Tjaša Pogačar, Francesco Morbidini, Roberto Ferrise, Carmelo Maucieri, Graziano Ghinassi, Marko Flajšman, Anna Dalla Marta, Maurizio Borin
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Soybean production under rainfed conditions is vulnerable to climate uncertainties, particularly in semi-arid and semi-humid regions. This study assessed the impacts of climate change (SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, SSP5–8.5) on soybean production and water requirements in the near (2041–2060), mid (2061–2080) and far (2081–2100) future. Simulations were conducted in specific locations in Italy (Castelfranco and Cesa) and Slovenia (Ljubljana) under rainfed and irrigated conditions, considering different thresholds of readily available water (RAW) depletion (25–100 %) to start irrigation. The results showed predominantly negative impacts of climate change under rainfed conditions. Under SSP1–2.6 and SSP2–4.5, irrigation mitigated these negative effects, leading to improved soybean performance in Italy in the near and mid future. In contrast, the mitigating potential of irrigation in Ljubljana was reduced, affecting negatively the soybean performance even under irrigated conditions. Nevertheless, the yield potential of Ljubljana remains higher compared to Castelfranco and Cesa. Soybean water productivity (WP ET ) followed similar trend as yield, showing minimal change except under SSP5–8.5 in the mid and far future. Climate change reduced the soybean crop water requirement (CWR) which decreased progressively from SSP1–2.6 to SSP5–8.5 across all time periods. The net irrigation requirement (NIR) was highest under SSP5–8.5, increasing from near to far future but remained stable under SSP1–2.6 and SSP2–4.5. Increasing the RAW depletion threshold for irrigation reduced soybean NIR but significantly decreased yield. Therefore, the results suggest that irrigating soybean at 50 % RAW depletion could be a viable adaptation strategy to climate change, effectively balancing the trade-offs between NIR and yield. • Slovenia achieves better rainfed soybean yield than Italy despite climate change. • Irrigation improves soybean yield more significantly in Italy than Slovenia. • Climate change lowers crop water requirement in both rainfed and irrigated conditions. • Climate change adaptation in soybean cultivation needs frequent, low-volume irrigation.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 165
University of Padua (IT), University of Ljubljana (SI), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
30.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.