The role of social norms in retirement saving: Evidence from two natural field experiments

Under-saving for retirement is a challenge for society, businesses, and individuals. Therefore, behavioral interventions that promote saving are valuable for economic and social well-being. Previous research demonstrates that retirement saving can be influenced by social-psychological mechanisms such as peer effects and norms. However, few large-scale experiments have investigated the role of different types of social norms in boosting retirement savings. Even fewer studies have examined how the time-framing (e.g., focusing on the present choice of saving vs. the future benefits of current saving) of such norms influences behavior. This paper provides real-life experimental evidence on the effects of (1) descriptive vs. injunctive norms on retirement saving behavior across two stages of the decision-making process (information search and saving behavior), and (2) the time-framing of such norms. Specifically, we conduct two large-scale field experiments on Norway-based bank customers in their online user interface, testing the effects of different norm messages on actual saving behavior. Study 1 (N = 455,509) finds that although injunctive (vs. descriptive) norms lead to higher click-through rates, descriptive norms are more effective than injunctive norms in increasing actual retirement savings. In essence, information about what most other people do (descriptive norms) was more effective in changing behavior than expert opinion on what one should do (injunctive norms). In Study 2 (N = 224,000), we vary descriptive norms across two saving schemes in a 2 (descriptive norm: present-focused vs. future-focused) X 2 (scheme: save-more-tomorrow vs. save-more-today) design. We find stronger effects of present-focused descriptive norms than future-focused descriptive norms in general, driven by differences in the save-more-today scheme. Effect sizes were generally small, but economically meaningful due to the low intervention costs of large-scale implementation. As a whole, our findings broaden the understanding of how social norms and their time-framing influence long-term saving behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115201
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of social norms in retirement saving: Evidence from two natural field experiments

Hallgeir Sjåstad, F. L. Santos, Jareef Martuza, Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen et al.
1 citations
Journal of Business Research
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
3.91
article

The role of social norms in retirement saving: Evidence from two natural field experiments

Hallgeir Sjåstad, F. L. Santos, Jareef Martuza, Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen, Trond Døskeland, Helge Thorbjørnsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Under-saving for retirement is a challenge for society, businesses, and individuals. Therefore, behavioral interventions that promote saving are valuable for economic and social well-being. Previous research demonstrates that retirement saving can be influenced by social-psychological mechanisms such as peer effects and norms. However, few large-scale experiments have investigated the role of different types of social norms in boosting retirement savings. Even fewer studies have examined how the time-framing (e.g., focusing on the present choice of saving vs. the future benefits of current saving) of such norms influences behavior. This paper provides real-life experimental evidence on the effects of (1) descriptive vs. injunctive norms on retirement saving behavior across two stages of the decision-making process (information search and saving behavior), and (2) the time-framing of such norms. Specifically, we conduct two large-scale field experiments on Norway-based bank customers in their online user interface, testing the effects of different norm messages on actual saving behavior. Study 1 (N = 455,509) finds that although injunctive (vs. descriptive) norms lead to higher click-through rates, descriptive norms are more effective than injunctive norms in increasing actual retirement savings. In essence, information about what most other people do (descriptive norms) was more effective in changing behavior than expert opinion on what one should do (injunctive norms). In Study 2 (N = 224,000), we vary descriptive norms across two saving schemes in a 2 (descriptive norm: present-focused vs. future-focused) X 2 (scheme: save-more-tomorrow vs. save-more-today) design. We find stronger effects of present-focused descriptive norms than future-focused descriptive norms in general, driven by differences in the save-more-today scheme. Effect sizes were generally small, but economically meaningful due to the low intervention costs of large-scale implementation. As a whole, our findings broaden the understanding of how social norms and their time-framing influence long-term saving behavior.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 190
Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.