Laser-ablation vs. bulk tissue ICP-MS for conifer tissue elemental analysis

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICP-MS) has emerged as a robust tool for directly measuring trace elements in solid, intact samples. Laser ablation requires minimal sample preparation, whereas more conventional bulk sample analysis entails preliminary size reduction and acid digestion, and hence risks sample contamination and volatilization losses. LA ICP-MS may allow for rapid determination of elemental constitution in plants at low detection limits; however, application of LA ICP-MS on plant tissues is challenged by sample heterogeneity, as well as the lack of recognized standards for calibration and criteria for sample preparation. We analyzed needle samples from an adult jack pine (Pinus banksiana L.) tree through LA ICP-MS using a widely available NIST SRM 610 quartz calibration standard, with <sup>43</sup>Ca as an internal standard element measured by electron probe microanalysis. LA ICP-MS analyses were run on intact needle samples and on pulverized, homogenized and pelletized samples (n = 21), and compared to needles dried, ground, and analyzed in triplicate with aqua regia acid digestion and conventional ICP-MS. Overall, the LA ICP-MS measures on intact pine samples accurately predicted the chemical composition of pine needle tissue obtained by the bulk sample acid-digestion and ICP-MS method for most elements, while preliminary pulverizing and pelletizing did not result in greater accuracy or reduced bias. LA ICP-MS analysis of many plant nutrients (<sup>31</sup>P, <sup>24</sup>Mg, <sup>66</sup>Zn) from both intact and pelletized tree needle samples matched the values obtained from acid-digestion ICP-MS most closely, while measures of less-stable metals (such as <sup>140</sup>Ce, <sup>139</sup>La, and <sup>57</sup>Fe) deviated more from acid-digested samples. Values of <sup>39</sup>K estimates varied between methods, as storage of <sup>39</sup>K is preferentially located in needle mesophyll layers beyond laser depths. Large deviations were found for volatile elements, with significantly lower <sup>208</sup>Pb concentrations measured by LA ICP-MS than acid-digested samples. We conclude that LA ICP-MS of intact tissues is a viable tool for accurate, non-destructive analysis for most elements and is particularly suitable for analysis of small samples and for volatile elements not amenable to conventional methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemosphere
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laser-ablation vs. bulk tissue ICP-MS for conifer tissue elemental analysis

Sean C. Thomas, Jasmine M. Williams
1 citations
Chemosphere
Heavy metals in environment
0.50
article

Laser-ablation vs. bulk tissue ICP-MS for conifer tissue elemental analysis

Sean C. Thomas, Jasmine M. Williams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICP-MS) has emerged as a robust tool for directly measuring trace elements in solid, intact samples. Laser ablation requires minimal sample preparation, whereas more conventional bulk sample analysis entails preliminary size reduction and acid digestion, and hence risks sample contamination and volatilization losses. LA ICP-MS may allow for rapid determination of elemental constitution in plants at low detection limits; however, application of LA ICP-MS on plant tissues is challenged by sample heterogeneity, as well as the lack of recognized standards for calibration and criteria for sample preparation. We analyzed needle samples from an adult jack pine (Pinus banksiana L.) tree through LA ICP-MS using a widely available NIST SRM 610 quartz calibration standard, with <sup>43</sup>Ca as an internal standard element measured by electron probe microanalysis. LA ICP-MS analyses were run on intact needle samples and on pulverized, homogenized and pelletized samples (n = 21), and compared to needles dried, ground, and analyzed in triplicate with aqua regia acid digestion and conventional ICP-MS. Overall, the LA ICP-MS measures on intact pine samples accurately predicted the chemical composition of pine needle tissue obtained by the bulk sample acid-digestion and ICP-MS method for most elements, while preliminary pulverizing and pelletizing did not result in greater accuracy or reduced bias. LA ICP-MS analysis of many plant nutrients (<sup>31</sup>P, <sup>24</sup>Mg, <sup>66</sup>Zn) from both intact and pelletized tree needle samples matched the values obtained from acid-digestion ICP-MS most closely, while measures of less-stable metals (such as <sup>140</sup>Ce, <sup>139</sup>La, and <sup>57</sup>Fe) deviated more from acid-digested samples. Values of <sup>39</sup>K estimates varied between methods, as storage of <sup>39</sup>K is preferentially located in needle mesophyll layers beyond laser depths. Large deviations were found for volatile elements, with significantly lower <sup>208</sup>Pb concentrations measured by LA ICP-MS than acid-digested samples. We conclude that LA ICP-MS of intact tissues is a viable tool for accurate, non-destructive analysis for most elements and is particularly suitable for analysis of small samples and for volatile elements not amenable to conventional methods.

ChemosphereVol. 374
University of Toronto (CA), Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Heavy metals in environment
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.