A short note on cue validity

In questionnaire development, content validity is usually operationalized by using items that comprehensively express all aspects of the object of measurement. We argue that this often leads to content coverage that is too broad, and that content validity needs pruning down when the intention is to measure conditions or constructs that should be discerned from other conditions or constructs – which is almost always the case. This pruned-down version of content validity we name “cue validity”, signifying the uniqueness of indicators for a construct. We show what negative consequences have been of ignoring cue validity in previously developed questionnaires and illustrate how taking cue validity into account can guide the validation of new questionnaires.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Psychology
Published
2025-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2025.100180
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A short note on cue validity

Piet van Tuijl, Peter Verboon, Jacques J. D. M. van Lankveld
Methods in Psychology
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

A short note on cue validity

Piet van Tuijl, Peter Verboon, Jacques J. D. M. van Lankveld
article en

Abstract

In questionnaire development, content validity is usually operationalized by using items that comprehensively express all aspects of the object of measurement. We argue that this often leads to content coverage that is too broad, and that content validity needs pruning down when the intention is to measure conditions or constructs that should be discerned from other conditions or constructs – which is almost always the case. This pruned-down version of content validity we name “cue validity”, signifying the uniqueness of indicators for a construct. We show what negative consequences have been of ignoring cue validity in previously developed questionnaires and illustrate how taking cue validity into account can guide the validation of new questionnaires.

Methods in PsychologyVol. 12
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A short note on cue validity — Piet van Tuijl, Peter Verboon, et al. · Methods in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS