JUDICIAL FACTOR'S PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS – A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

The subject of the article is the analysis of the role of the judicial element in preparatory proceedings. The author presents the issue of the preparatory proceedings model, addressing historical and comparative aspects. Subsequently, the article discusses various configurations of the judicial element in preparatory proceedings, namely the model with an investigative judge, the model with a judge for preparatory proceedings, and the model involving court participation. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are highlighted, along with examples from selected countries. In conclusion, the author provides a summative evaluation, identifying what they consider the optimal model and procedural solution, and emphasizes the need for a reassessment of current practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Legal and Social Order
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55516/ijlso.v5i1.241
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JUDICIAL FACTOR'S PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS – A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Tomasz Bojanowski
International Journal of Legal and Social Order
European and International Law Studies
article

JUDICIAL FACTOR'S PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS – A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Tomasz Bojanowski
article en

Abstract

The subject of the article is the analysis of the role of the judicial element in preparatory proceedings. The author presents the issue of the preparatory proceedings model, addressing historical and comparative aspects. Subsequently, the article discusses various configurations of the judicial element in preparatory proceedings, namely the model with an investigative judge, the model with a judge for preparatory proceedings, and the model involving court participation. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are highlighted, along with examples from selected countries. In conclusion, the author provides a summative evaluation, identifying what they consider the optimal model and procedural solution, and emphasizes the need for a reassessment of current practices.

International Journal of Legal and Social OrderVol. 5(1)
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.