Strategic insights from simulation gaming of AI race dynamics

We present insights from `Intelligence Rising’, a scenario exploration exercise about possible AI futures. Drawing on the experiences of facilitators who have overseen 43 games over a four-year period, we illuminate recurring patterns, strategies, and decision-making processes observed during gameplay. Our analysis reveals key strategic considerations about AI development trajectories in this simulated environment, including: the destabilising effects of AI races, the crucial role of international cooperation in mitigating catastrophic risks, the challenges of aligning corporate and national interests, and the potential for rapid, transformative change in AI capabilities. We highlight places where we believe the game has been effective in exposing participants to the complexities and uncertainties inherent in AI governance. Key recurring gameplay themes include the emergence of international agreements, challenges to the robustness of such agreements, the critical role of cybersecurity in AI development, and the potential for unexpected crises to dramatically alter AI trajectories. By documenting these insights, we aim to provide valuable foresight for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers navigating the complex landscape of AI development and governance. • The development of advanced AI typically leads to AI races between states (e.g., U.S., China) or AI firms (e.g., OpenAI, Google); cooperation is very difficult. • Race dynamics in advanced AI development increases the risk of AI safety failures or geopolitical failures, dramatically decreasing the likelihood of positive futures. • Outcomes leading to positive futures almost always require coordination between actors who by default have strong incentives to compete — both for firms and nations. • Actors with the resources and understanding of the risks are rare, and have outsized potential to increase risk (e.g., by racing) or to improve safety (e.g., via supporting technical safety research). • AI development does not happen in isolation — it affects, and is affected by, geopolitics, economical factors, social factors, and state actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103563
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic insights from simulation gaming of AI race dynamics

Ross Gruetzemacher, Shahar Avin, James Fox, Alexander K Saeri
3 citations
Futures
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
2.05
article

Strategic insights from simulation gaming of AI race dynamics

Ross Gruetzemacher, Shahar Avin, James Fox, Alexander K Saeri
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We present insights from `Intelligence Rising’, a scenario exploration exercise about possible AI futures. Drawing on the experiences of facilitators who have overseen 43 games over a four-year period, we illuminate recurring patterns, strategies, and decision-making processes observed during gameplay. Our analysis reveals key strategic considerations about AI development trajectories in this simulated environment, including: the destabilising effects of AI races, the crucial role of international cooperation in mitigating catastrophic risks, the challenges of aligning corporate and national interests, and the potential for rapid, transformative change in AI capabilities. We highlight places where we believe the game has been effective in exposing participants to the complexities and uncertainties inherent in AI governance. Key recurring gameplay themes include the emergence of international agreements, challenges to the robustness of such agreements, the critical role of cybersecurity in AI development, and the potential for unexpected crises to dramatically alter AI trajectories. By documenting these insights, we aim to provide valuable foresight for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers navigating the complex landscape of AI development and governance. • The development of advanced AI typically leads to AI races between states (e.g., U.S., China) or AI firms (e.g., OpenAI, Google); cooperation is very difficult. • Race dynamics in advanced AI development increases the risk of AI safety failures or geopolitical failures, dramatically decreasing the likelihood of positive futures. • Outcomes leading to positive futures almost always require coordination between actors who by default have strong incentives to compete — both for firms and nations. • Actors with the resources and understanding of the risks are rare, and have outsized potential to increase risk (e.g., by racing) or to improve safety (e.g., via supporting technical safety research). • AI development does not happen in isolation — it affects, and is affected by, geopolitics, economical factors, social factors, and state actions.

FuturesVol. 167
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Cambridge (GB), Wichita State University (US), University of Oxford (GB), Futures Group (United States) (US), Alternative Futures Associates (US), Institute for the Future (US), Science Oxford (GB), Substance Abuse Free Environment (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.