Exploring the interplay of transport, social, and geographical disadvantages and its effect on perceived inaccessibility

To address transport injustice and social exclusion, the needs and perceptions of different groups of individuals seem indispensable. Consequently, perceived accessibility has received a growing interest in recent years. While it is well established that transport and social disadvantages cause transport poverty and perceived inaccessibility, only recently the relevance of geographical disadvantages has been addressed. This paper explores the idea that an individual is more likely to experience inaccessibility if they face transport, social, or geographical disadvantages in at least two of these dimensions of transport poverty. For instance, while living in a rural area or lacking the ownership of a car may not translate into low perceived access on themselves, the combination of the two might lower perceived access. To empirically assess whether and which disadvantages indeed lower perceived accessibility further, the effect of combinations of disadvantages on perceived accessibility in rural and urban areas of the Netherlands are systematically explored using a regression analysis. Data is retrieved from the Dutch National Travel Survey. This survey includes a 1-day travel diary, measures both objective and subjective accessibility, and is administered among a representative sample of the Dutch population. In total, a large and representative sample of 22,742 participants is included in the analysis. Results highlight that rural-living individuals only perceive inaccessibility if they indeed encounter one or more transport and/or social disadvantages as well. Also, not possessing a driver's license determines perceived inaccessibility to a larger extent than a lack of car ownership. Lastly, possessing an e-bike is beneficial for the elderly in both rural and urban Dutch areas. The research findings may support policymakers and practitioners in tailoring policy interventions towards the needs of individuals who suffer from multiple disadvantages. • Rural-living individuals perceive inaccessibility if they also experience transport and/or social disadvantage(s). • In rural areas, not possessing a driver's license affects perceived inaccessibility more than a lack of car ownership. • Older people benefit from the ownership of an e-bike in both rural and urban areas. • Individuals with the lowest levels of accessibility encountertransport and social rather than geographical disadvantages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport Geography
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104151
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the interplay of transport, social, and geographical disadvantages and its effect on perceived inaccessibility

Maarten Kroesen, Milan L. Moleman
3 citations
Journal of Transport Geography
Urban Transport and Accessibility
6.53
article

Exploring the interplay of transport, social, and geographical disadvantages and its effect on perceived inaccessibility

Maarten Kroesen, Milan L. Moleman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

To address transport injustice and social exclusion, the needs and perceptions of different groups of individuals seem indispensable. Consequently, perceived accessibility has received a growing interest in recent years. While it is well established that transport and social disadvantages cause transport poverty and perceived inaccessibility, only recently the relevance of geographical disadvantages has been addressed. This paper explores the idea that an individual is more likely to experience inaccessibility if they face transport, social, or geographical disadvantages in at least two of these dimensions of transport poverty. For instance, while living in a rural area or lacking the ownership of a car may not translate into low perceived access on themselves, the combination of the two might lower perceived access. To empirically assess whether and which disadvantages indeed lower perceived accessibility further, the effect of combinations of disadvantages on perceived accessibility in rural and urban areas of the Netherlands are systematically explored using a regression analysis. Data is retrieved from the Dutch National Travel Survey. This survey includes a 1-day travel diary, measures both objective and subjective accessibility, and is administered among a representative sample of the Dutch population. In total, a large and representative sample of 22,742 participants is included in the analysis. Results highlight that rural-living individuals only perceive inaccessibility if they indeed encounter one or more transport and/or social disadvantages as well. Also, not possessing a driver's license determines perceived inaccessibility to a larger extent than a lack of car ownership. Lastly, possessing an e-bike is beneficial for the elderly in both rural and urban Dutch areas. The research findings may support policymakers and practitioners in tailoring policy interventions towards the needs of individuals who suffer from multiple disadvantages. • Rural-living individuals perceive inaccessibility if they also experience transport and/or social disadvantage(s). • In rural areas, not possessing a driver's license affects perceived inaccessibility more than a lack of car ownership. • Older people benefit from the ownership of an e-bike in both rural and urban areas. • Individuals with the lowest levels of accessibility encountertransport and social rather than geographical disadvantages.

Journal of Transport GeographyVol. 123
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
6.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.